Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22516351›Full record

Trial reportJournal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology2012

Association between history and physical examination factors and change in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness after spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain.

Shane L Koppenhaver, Julie M Fritz, Jeffrey J Hebert, Greg N Kawchuk, Eric C Parent, Norman W Gill, John D Childs, Deydre S Teyhen

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Muscle Control and Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The evaluation of lumbar multifidus muscle function via palpation: reliability and validity of a new clinical test.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Shane L KoppenhaverU.S. Army-Baylor University, Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, San Antonio, TX, USA. shanekoppenhaver@mac.com
Julie M Fritz
Jeffrey J Hebert
Greg N Kawchuk
Eric C Parent
Norman W Gill
John D Childs
Deydre S Teyhen
United States Army · USUniversity of Alberta · CABaylor University · USIntermountain Healthcare · USKeesler Medical Center · USMurdoch University · AU

Funding

Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Effects of Spinal Manipulative TherapyR21AT004221 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FRITZ, JULIE M · 2008 to 2009
$477k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT004221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the clinical characteristics of patients with low back pain (LBP) who display improved lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle function after spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) may provide insight into a potentially synergistic interaction between SMT and exercise. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the baseline historical and physical examination factors associated with increased contracted LM muscle thickness one week after SMT. Eighty-one participants with LBP underwent a baseline physical examination and ultrasound imaging assessment of the LM muscle during submaximal contraction before and one week after SMT. The relationship between baseline examination variables and 1-week change in contracted LM thickness was assessed using correlation analysis and hierarchical multiple linear regression. Four variables best predicted the magnitude of increases in contracted LM muscle thickness after SMT. When combined, these variables suggest that patients with LBP, (1) that are fairly acute, (2) have at least a moderately good prognosis without focal and irritable symptoms, and (3) exhibit signs of spinal instability, may be the best candidates for a combined SMT and lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) treatment approach.

Indexed as

Medical History TakingPhysical ExaminationAdultBackFemaleHumansLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMaleManipulation, SpinalMuscle, SkeletalOrgan SizeTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID22516351
PMCPMC3407297
OpenAlexW2105355655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.