ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2012
Optimal dosages of fluoxetine in the treatment of hypoxic brain injury induced by 3-nitropropionic acid: implications for the adjunctive treatment of patients after acute ischemic stroke.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- An Overview of the Pathophysiological Mechanisms of 3-Nitropropionic Acid (3-NPA) as a Neurotoxin in a Huntington's Disease Model and Its Relevance to Drug Discovery and Development.Neurochemical research · 2023Review
- Behavioral tests in rodent models of stroke.Brain hemorrhages · 2020Article
- Role of the IL-1 Pathway in Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration and Decreased Voluntary Movement.Molecular neurobiology · 2017Article
- Fluoxetine Prevents AβFrontiers in pharmacology · 2016Article
- Fluoxetine Maintains a State of Heightened Responsiveness to Motor Training Early After Stroke in a Mouse Model.Stroke · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (Flx) has tried to treat patients suffered acute ischemic stroke because of its possible neuroprotective actions. However, besides the neuroprotective effect, Flx at high concentration also induces some actions in contradiction to neuroprotection in the brain. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether Flx presents neuroprotective effect against 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP)-induced hypoxic brain injury, and what is the most suitable dosage of Flx.
methodsMouse model was established by subacute systemic administration of 3-NP. Rotarod and pole tests were used to evaluate motor deficit. The oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage were assessed respectively by measuring malondialdehyde and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine content in brain homogenates.
resultsAccording to measurements in the rotarod test, 7 days pretreatment plus 5 days treatment of Flx at low (2.5 mg/kg/day) and, to a lesser degree, medium (5 mg/kg/day) doses exerted a rapid and strong protection against the neurotoxicity induced by 3-NP, whereas Flx at high dose (10mg/kg/day) showed a much late and light effect. Similarly, in the pole test, Flx at 2.5 mg/kg/day had the strongest protective effects. Again, only Flx administration at 2.5 mg/kg/day canceled out the enhancement of malondialdehyde and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in striatum following 3-NP neurotoxication.
conclusionsFlx attenuated the motor deficits induced by 3-NP in a dose-dependent manner. In contrary to the high dose, Flx at the lower doses had a more remarkable effect against 3-NP insult, similar to acute ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.