Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22515422›Full record

ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2012

Recognition of dextran-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle conjugates (Feridex) via macrophage scavenger receptor charged domains.

Ying Chao, Milan Makale, Priya Prakash Karmali, Yuriy Sharikov, Igor Tsigelny, Sergei Merkulov, Santosh Kesari, Wolf Wrasidlo, Erkki Ruoslahti, Dmitri Simberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Complement opsonization of nanoparticles: Differences between humans and preclinical species.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ying ChaoMoores Cancer Center, School of Medicine, ‡Department of Neurosciences, and ⊥San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, California, United States.
Milan Makale
Priya Prakash Karmali
Yuriy Sharikov
Igor Tsigelny
Sergei Merkulov
Santosh Kesari
Wolf Wrasidlo
Erkki Ruoslahti
Dmitri Simberg
Moores Cancer CenterCancer Research Center · USReprogenetics · USSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Tumor Therapy/Annihilation Using a Smart NanoPlatform (SNaP)U54CA119335 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ESENER, SADIK · 2005 to 2010
$21.2M
Isolation of rare circulating tumor cells from blood using microbubblesR21CA137721 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SIMBERG, DMITRI · 2009 to 2010
$360k
Non-invasive sampling of DNA markers for pancreatic cancer screeningR21CA164880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LIU, YU-TSUENG · 2012 to 2013
$343k
NCI NIH HHS 5U54CA119335NCI NIH HHS CA 137721-01NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA23100NCI NIH HHS R21 CA137721NCI NIH HHS R21 CA164880NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (dextran-SPIO conjugates) offer the attractive possibility of enhancing MRI imaging sensitivity so that small or diffuse lesions can be detected. However, systemically injected SPIOs are rapidly removed by macrophages. We engineered embryonic cells (HEK293T) to express major macrophage scavenger receptor (SR) subtypes including SR-AI, MARCO, and endothelial receptor collectin-12. These SRs possess a positively charged collagen-like (CL) domain and they promoted SPIO uptake, while the charge neutral lipoprotein receptor SR-BI did not. In silico modeling indicated a positive net charge on the CL domain and a net negative charge on the cysteine-rich (CR) domain of MARCO and SR-AI. In vitro experiments revealed that CR domain deletion in SR-AI boosted uptake of SPIO 3-fold, while deletion of MARCO's CR domain abolished this uptake. These data suggest that future studies might productively focus on the validation and further exploration of SR charge fields in SPIO recognition.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularCollagen Type IContrast MediaDextransHEK293 CellsHumansMacrophagesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesModels, MolecularNanoparticlesProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, ScavengerCollagen Type IContrast MediaDextransferumoxidesMagnetite NanoparticlesReceptors, Scavenger

Identifiers

PMID22515422
PMCPMC3444675
OpenAlexW1977025376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.