Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22515159›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2012

Chronic illness and patient satisfaction.

Caroline S Carlin, Jon B Christianson, Patricia Keenan, Michael Finch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline S CarlinMedica Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55440, USA. caroline.carlin@medica.com
Jon B Christianson
Patricia Keenan
Michael Finch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how the relationship between patient characteristics, patient experience with the health care system, and overall satisfaction with care varies with illness complexity. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingTelephone survey in 14 U.S. geographical areas. STUDY

designStructural equation modeling was used to examine how relationships among patient characteristics, three constructs representing patient experience with the health care system, and overall satisfaction with care vary across patients by number of chronic illnesses. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsRandom digital dial telephone survey of adults with one or more chronic illnesses. PRINCIPAL

findingsPatients with more chronic illnesses report higher overall satisfaction. The total effects of better patient-provider interaction and support for patient self-management are associated with higher satisfaction for all levels of chronic illness. The latter effect increases with illness burden. Older, female, or insured patients are more satisfied; highly educated patients are less satisfied.

conclusionsProviders seeking to improve their patient satisfaction scores could do so by considering patient characteristics when accepting new patients or deciding who to refer to other providers for treatment. However, our findings suggest constructive actions that providers can take to improve their patient satisfaction scores without selection on patient characteristics.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsResidence CharacteristicsSelf CareSex FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID22515159
PMCPMC3523374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.