ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2012
EGFR tyrosine kinase mutation testing in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical impact of mutation fraction in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positive NSCLC patients.British journal of cancer · 2016Trial
- Gefitinib versus placebo in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the NCIC CTG BR19 study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013Trial
- Landscape of targeted therapies for lung squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Relationship of thyroid transcription factor 1 to EGFR status in non-small-cell lung cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2014Article
- Economic Impact of Tissue Testing and Treatments of Metastatic NSCLC in the Era of Personalized Medicine.Frontiers in oncology · 2014Review
- EGFR activating mutations detected by different PCR techniques in Caucasian NSCLC patients with CNS metastases: short report.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2013Article
- Impact of the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology clinical practice guidelines for EGFR and ALK testing in lung cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2013Article
- Erlotinib : a guide to its use in first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor-activating mutations.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) tumours with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (efgr) tyrosine kinase are highly sensitized to the effects of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib, suggesting the possibility of targeted treatment of nsclc based on EFGR mutation status. However, no standardized method exists for assessing the EGFR mutation status of tumours. Also, it is not known if available methods are feasible for routine screening. To address that question, we conducted a validation study of methods used for detecting EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 at molecular laboratories located in five specialized Canadian cancer centres.
methodsThe screening methods were first optimized using cell lines harbouring the mutations in question. A validation phase using anonymized patient samples followed.
resultsThe methods used at the sites were highly specific and sensitive in detecting both mutations in cell-line dna (specificity of 100% and sensitivity of at least 1% across all centres). In the validation phase, we observed excellent concordance between the laboratories for detecting mutations in the patient samples. Concordant results were obtained in 26 of 30 samples (approximately 87%). In general, the samples for which results were discordant were also less optimal, containing small amounts of tumour.
conclusionsOur results suggest that currently available methods are capable of reliably detecting exon 19 and exon 21 mutations of EFGR in tumour samples (provided that sufficient tumour material is available) and that routine screening for those mutations is feasible in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.