Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22514499›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2012

EGFR tyrosine kinase mutation testing in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

S Kamel-Reid, G Chong, D N Ionescu, A M Magliocco, A Spatz, M Tsao, X Weng, S Young, T Zhang, D Soulieres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Gefitinib versus placebo in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the NCIC CTG BR19 study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S Kamel-ReidDepartment of Pathology, The University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
G Chong
D N Ionescu
A M Magliocco
A Spatz
M Tsao
X Weng
S Young
T Zhang
D Soulieres

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) tumours with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (efgr) tyrosine kinase are highly sensitized to the effects of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib, suggesting the possibility of targeted treatment of nsclc based on EFGR mutation status. However, no standardized method exists for assessing the EGFR mutation status of tumours. Also, it is not known if available methods are feasible for routine screening. To address that question, we conducted a validation study of methods used for detecting EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 at molecular laboratories located in five specialized Canadian cancer centres.

methodsThe screening methods were first optimized using cell lines harbouring the mutations in question. A validation phase using anonymized patient samples followed.

resultsThe methods used at the sites were highly specific and sensitive in detecting both mutations in cell-line dna (specificity of 100% and sensitivity of at least 1% across all centres). In the validation phase, we observed excellent concordance between the laboratories for detecting mutations in the patient samples. Concordant results were obtained in 26 of 30 samples (approximately 87%). In general, the samples for which results were discordant were also less optimal, containing small amounts of tumour.

conclusionsOur results suggest that currently available methods are capable of reliably detecting exon 19 and exon 21 mutations of EFGR in tumour samples (provided that sufficient tumour material is available) and that routine screening for those mutations is feasible in clinical practice.

Indexed as

epidermal growth factor receptorerlotinibgefitinibgenetic testingNon-small-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID22514499
PMCPMC3320234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.