Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22514298›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2012

Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.

Stéphane F Maison, Hajime Usubuchi, Douglas E Vetter, A Bélen Elgoyhen, Steven A Thomas, M Charles Liberman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Modulation of Cochlear Micromechanics Requires P2X4 Receptor in Outer Hair Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ATP-gated ion channels mediate adaptation to elevated sound levels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stéphane F MaisonDepartment of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School and Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114-3096, USA. stephane_maison@meei.harvard.edu
Hajime Usubuchi
Douglas E Vetter
A Bélen Elgoyhen
Steven A Thomas
M Charles Liberman

Funding

SINGLE-NEURON MARKING IN THE STUDY OF ABNORMAL COCHLEASR01DC000188 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Gabriel Corfas, M. Charles Liberman · 1989 to 2026
$15.1M
Imaging Core PlanP30DC005209 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI LIBERMAN, M. CHARLES · 2002 to 2016
$12.0M
TUSM/T-NEMC CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH - Imaging CoreP30NS047243 · NINDS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI JACKSON, F ROB · 2003 to 2017
$10.0M
Molecular mechanisms of memrory retrievalR01MH063352 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMAS, STEVEN A · 2002 to 2011
$3.2M
Investigations into the mouse olivocochlear systemR01DC006258 · NIDCD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI VETTER, DOUGLAS E · 2004 to 2008
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005209NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC-5029NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000188NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-006258NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-0188NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH-063352NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS-047243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suppression of ipsilateral distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) by contralateral noise is used in humans and animals to assay the strength of sound-evoked negative feedback from the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent pathway. However, depending on species and anesthesia, contributions of other feedback systems to the middle or inner ear can cloud the interpretation. Here, contributions of MOC and middle-ear muscle reflexes, as well as autonomic feedback, to contra-noise suppression in anesthetized mice are dissected by selectively eliminating each pathway by surgical transection, pharmacological blockade, or targeted gene deletion. When ipsilateral DPOAEs were evoked by low-level primaries, contra-noise suppression was typically ~1 dB with contra-noise levels around 95 dB SPL, and it always disappeared upon contralateral cochlear destruction. Lack of middle-ear muscle contribution was suggested by persistence of contra-noise suppression after paralysis with curare, tensor tympani cauterization, or section of the facial nerve. Contribution of cochlear sympathetics was ruled out by studying mutant mice lacking adrenergic signaling (dopamine β-hydroxylase knockouts). Surprisingly, contra-noise effects on low-level DPOAEs were also not diminished by eliminating the MOC system pharmacologically (strychnine), surgically, or by deletion of relevant cholinergic receptors (α9/α10). In contrast, when ipsilateral DPOAEs were evoked by high-level primaries, the contra-noise suppression, although comparable in magnitude, was largely eliminated by MOC blockade or section. Possible alternate pathways are discussed for the source of contra-noise-evoked effects at low ipsilateral levels.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAfferent PathwaysAnimalsBiofeedback, PsychologyCochleaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMuscle, SkeletalOlivary NucleusOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID22514298
PMCPMC3404795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.