ArticleThe British journal of radiology2012
Perfusion CT to assess angiogenesis in colon cancer: technical limitations and practical challenges.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03448302 (Computed Tomography Perfusion of Colorectal Cancer in Correlation With Tumor Grade), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Computed Tomography Perfusion of Colorectal Cancer in Correlation With Tumor Grade
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- FDG-PET/CT in colorectal cancer: potential for vascular-metabolic imaging to provide markers of prognosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Observational
- Vascular Normalization: A New Window Opened for Cancer Therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Dynamic Biomarkers of Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: A Review.Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2017Review
- Markers of Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: Where Are We Now and What Should Be Next?Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2016Review
- A Systematic Review on the Role of the Perfusion Computed Tomography in Abdominal Cancer.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePerfusion CT may have the potential to quantify the degree of angiogenesis of solid tumours in vivo. This study aims to identify the practical and technical challenges inherent to the technique, and evaluate its feasibility in colorectal tumours.
methods51 patients from 2 institutions prospectively underwent a single perfusion CT on 2 different multidetector scanners. The patients were advised to breath-hold as long as possible, followed by shallow breathing, and were given intravenous buscopan to reduce movement. Numerous steps were explored to identify the challenges.
results43 patients successfully completed the perfusion CT as per protocol. Inability to detect the tumour (n=3), misplacement of dynamic sequence co-ordinates (n=2), failure of contrast injection (n=2) and displacement of tumour (n=1) were the reasons for failure. In 14 cases excessive respiratory motion displaced the tumour out of the scanning field along the temporal sequence, leading to erroneous data capture. In nine patients, minor displacements of the tumour were corrected by repositioning the region of interest (ROI) to its original position after reviewing each dynamic sequence slice. In 20 patients the tumour was stable, and data captured from the ROI were representative, and could have been analysed by commercially available Body Tumor Perfusion 3.0® software (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). Hence all data were manually analysed by MATLAB® processing software (MathWorks, Cambridge, UK).
conclusionPerfusion CT in tumours susceptible to motion during acquisition makes accurate data capture challenging and requires meticulous attention to detail. Motion correction software is essential if perfusion CT is to be used routinely in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.