Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22513958›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Pycnogenol® (extract of French maritime pine bark) for the treatment of chronic disorders.

Anel Schoonees, Janicke Visser, Alfred Musekiwa, Jimmy Volmink

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral herbal therapies for treating osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ebola Entry Inhibitors Discovered fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Inhibitory Effect of PycnogenolBalkan medical journal · 2016
    Article
  15. [Drug Treatment of Chronic Venous Diesease].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2016
    Article
  16. Psychiatric Disorders and Polyphenols: Can They Be Helpful in Therapy?Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Flavonoids and asthma.Nutrients · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anel SchooneesDivision of Human Nutrition, Stellenbosch University,Tygerberg, South Africa.
Janicke Visser
Alfred Musekiwa
Jimmy Volmink
Stellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxidative stress has been implicated in the development of a number of conditions including cancer, arthritic disorders and cardiovascular disease. Pycnogenol(®), a herbal dietary supplement derived from French maritime pine bark extract, is standardised to contain 70% procyanidin which is a powerful antioxidant. Pycnogenol(®) is marketed as a supplement for preventing or treating a wide range of chronic conditions.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of Pycnogenol(®) for the treatment of chronic disorders. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL (until 18 September 2010), MEDLINE (until 18 September 2010) and EMBASE (until 13 October 2010) as well as three trial registries. We also contacted the manufacturer of Pycnogenol(®) and hand-searched bibliographies of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of Pycnogenol(®) in adults or children with any chronic disorder were included. We assessed clinical outcomes directly related to the disorder (stratified as participant- and investigator-reported) and all-cause mortality as primary outcomes. We also assessed adverse events and biomarkers of oxidative stress. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted all data and assessed risk of bias. A third author additionally extracted information on outcomes and results. With three exceptions, results for outcomes across studies could not be pooled. MAIN

resultsThis review includes 15 trials with a total of 791 participants that have evaluated Pycnogenol(®) for the treatment of seven different chronic disorders. These included asthma (two studies; N = 86), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (one study; N = 61), chronic venous insufficiency (two studies; N = 60), diabetes mellitus (four studies; N = 201), erectile dysfunction (one study; N = 21), hypertension (two studies; N = 69) and osteoarthritis (three studies; N = 293). Two of the studies were conducted exclusively in children; the others involved adults.Due to small sample size, limited numbers of trials per condition, variation in outcomes evaluated and outcome measures used, as well as the risk of bias in the included studies, no definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy or safety of Pycnogenol(®) are possible. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence is insufficient to support Pycnogenol(®) use for the treatment of any chronic disorder. Well-designed, adequately powered trials are needed to establish the value of this treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAntioxidantsAsthmaAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildChronic DiseaseDiabetes MellitusErectile DysfunctionFemaleFlavonoidsHumansHypertensionMaleOsteoarthritisPlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntioxidantsFlavonoidsPlant Extractspycnogenols

Identifiers

PMID22513958
OpenAlexW2111025177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.