Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22513956›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Jia Liu, Luning Wang, Si-Yan Zhan, Yinyin Xia

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Multiple sclerosis treatment and infectious issues: update 2013.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Daclizumab therapy for multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jia LiuDepartment of Geriatric Neurology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. Jia.Liu@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Luning Wang
Si-Yan Zhan
Yinyin Xia
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNKing University · USNational Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention,China CDC · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anti-CD25 treatment of daclizumab appears to be effective in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) as regards clinical and MRI outcomes. Moreover, there are no severe safety concerns arising from clinical testing so far.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of daclizumab for the clinical progression of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group's Trials Register (February 2012), MEDLINE (January 1966 to February 2012), EMBASE (January 1985 to February 2012). At the same time, we handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials reports (February 2012) from the most important neurological associations and MS Societies. Contacts with researchers participating in trials on daclizumab have been established. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating daclizumab, alone or combined with other treatments versus placebo, or any other treatment for patients with RRMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed references retrieved for possible inclusion. Disagreements regarding inclusion were resolved by consensus. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse effects information from the trials. MAIN

resultsWe identified 470 references from all electronic databases searched excluding duplicate. After screening of titles and abstracts, full papers of 10 studies were obtained and assessed for eligibility. An additional ongoing trial was found. Only one trial (230 participants) evaluating the efficacy of daclizumab versus placebo in interferon beta treated patients was included. It was judged as of high quality study. No significant difference was found in the expanded disability score changes and the annualised relapse rate comparing treated versus placebo groups. No significant difference of common adverse events was found across all the groups at the endpoint. The mean number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions was significantly decreased in the interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group, compared with that in the interferon beta and placebo group. AUTHORS'

conclusionsDaclizumab is well tolerated in combination with interferon beta treated multiple sclerosis population. Comparing with placebo, high-dose daclizumab can significantly decreased the number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions. However, the evidence of recommendation is insufficient. More well-designed RCTs or crossover controlled trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daclizumab.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDaclizumabHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDaclizumabImmunoglobulin GImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-beta

Identifiers

PMID22513956
OpenAlexW4246117123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.