SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Infection risk in patients on multiple sclerosis therapeutics.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Multiple sclerosis treatment and infectious issues: update 2013.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014Review
- Modulation of IL-2Rα with daclizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2013Review
- Daclizumab therapy for multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013Review
- Risk-benefit considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anti-CD25 treatment of daclizumab appears to be effective in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) as regards clinical and MRI outcomes. Moreover, there are no severe safety concerns arising from clinical testing so far.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of daclizumab for the clinical progression of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group's Trials Register (February 2012), MEDLINE (January 1966 to February 2012), EMBASE (January 1985 to February 2012). At the same time, we handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials reports (February 2012) from the most important neurological associations and MS Societies. Contacts with researchers participating in trials on daclizumab have been established. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating daclizumab, alone or combined with other treatments versus placebo, or any other treatment for patients with RRMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed references retrieved for possible inclusion. Disagreements regarding inclusion were resolved by consensus. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse effects information from the trials. MAIN
resultsWe identified 470 references from all electronic databases searched excluding duplicate. After screening of titles and abstracts, full papers of 10 studies were obtained and assessed for eligibility. An additional ongoing trial was found. Only one trial (230 participants) evaluating the efficacy of daclizumab versus placebo in interferon beta treated patients was included. It was judged as of high quality study. No significant difference was found in the expanded disability score changes and the annualised relapse rate comparing treated versus placebo groups. No significant difference of common adverse events was found across all the groups at the endpoint. The mean number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions was significantly decreased in the interferon beta and high-dose daclizumab group, compared with that in the interferon beta and placebo group. AUTHORS'
conclusionsDaclizumab is well tolerated in combination with interferon beta treated multiple sclerosis population. Comparing with placebo, high-dose daclizumab can significantly decreased the number of new or enlarged gadolinium contrast-enhancing lesions. However, the evidence of recommendation is insufficient. More well-designed RCTs or crossover controlled trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daclizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.