Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22513940›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III.

Renske I Wadman, Wendy M J Bosboom, W Ludo van der Pol, Leonard H van den Berg, John H J Wokke, Susan T Iannaccone, Alexander F J E Vrancken

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy type I.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Genetics of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Progress and Challenges.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Renske I WadmanDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. r.i.wadman@umcutrecht.nl.
Wendy M J Bosboom
W Ludo van der Pol
Leonard H van den Berg
John H J Wokke
Susan T Iannaccone
Alexander F J E Vrancken
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLSint Lucas Andreas Hospital · NLThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by degeneration of anterior horn cells, which leads to progressive muscle weakness. Children with SMA type II do not develop the ability to walk without support and have a shortened life expectancy, whereas children with SMA type III develop the ability to walk and have a normal life expectancy. There are no known efficacious drug treatments that influence the disease course of SMA. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

objectivesTo evaluate whether drug treatment is able to slow or arrest the disease progression of SMA types II and III and to assess if such therapy can be given safely. Drug treatment for SMA type I is the topic of a separate updated Cochrane review. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (8 March 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1991 to February 2011), EMBASE (January 1991 to February 2011) and ISI Web of Knowledge (January 1991 to March 8 2011). We also searched clinicaltrials.gov to identify as yet unpublished trials (8 March 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomised or quasi-randomised trials that examined the efficacy of drug treatment for SMA types II and III. Participants had to fulfil the clinical criteria and have a deletion or mutation of the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene (5q11.2-13.2) that was confirmed by genetic analysis.The primary outcome measure was to be change in disability score within one year after the onset of treatment. Secondary outcome measures within one year after the onset of treatment were to be change in muscle strength, ability to stand or walk, change in quality of life, time from the start of treatment until death or full time ventilation and adverse events attributable to treatment during the trial period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data from all potentially relevant trials. Pooled relative risks and pooled standardised mean differences were to be calculated to assess treatment efficacy. Risk of bias was systematically analysed. MAIN

resultsSix randomised placebo-controlled trials on treatment for SMA types II and III were found and included in the review: the four in the original review and two trials added in this update. The treatments were creatine (55 participants), phenylbutyrate (107 participants), gabapentin (84 participants), thyrotropin releasing hormone (9 participants), hydroxyurea (57 participants), and combination therapy with valproate and acetyl-L-carnitine (61 participants). None of these studies were completely free of bias. All studies had adequate blinding, sequence generation and reports of primary outcomes.None of the included trials showed any statistically significant effects on the outcome measures in participants with SMA types II and III. One participant died due to suffocation in the hydroxyurea trial and one participant died in the creatine trial. No participants in any of the other four trials died or reached the state of full time ventilation. Serious side effects were infrequent. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no proven efficacious drug treatment for SMA types II and III.

Indexed as

AcetylcarnitineAdolescentAminesChildChild, PreschoolCreatineCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDisease ProgressionGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansHydroxyureaNeuroprotective AgentsPhenylbutyratesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodAcetylcarnitineAminesCreatineCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHydroxyureaNeuroprotective AgentsPhenylbutyratesThyrotropin-Releasing HormoneValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22513940
OpenAlexW1937983913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.