SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy type I.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) modulators for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Real-world evidence on nusinersen treatment of persons with SMA: a focused review.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Preliminary insights into RNA in CSF of pediatric SMA patients after 6 months of nusinersen.Biology direct · 2023Article
- Article
- Therapeutic approaches for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).Gene therapy · 2017Review
- Emerging therapies and challenges in spinal muscular atrophy.Annals of neurology · 2017Review
- Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors - emerging roles in neuronal memory, learning, synaptic plasticity and neural regeneration.Current neuropharmacology · 2016Review
- Resistance strength training exercise in children with spinal muscular atrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2015Article
- The Genetics of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Progress and Challenges.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2015Review
- No amelioration of uromodulin maturation and trafficking defect by sodium 4-phenylbutyrate in vivo: studies in mouse models of uromodulin-associated kidney disease.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Histone deacetylase inhibitors as potential treatment for spinal muscular atrophy.Genetics and molecular biology · 2013Review
- SMA-MAP: a plasma protein panel for spinal muscular atrophy.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by degeneration of anterior horn cells, which leads to progressive muscle weakness. Children with SMA type II do not develop the ability to walk without support and have a shortened life expectancy, whereas children with SMA type III develop the ability to walk and have a normal life expectancy. There are no known efficacious drug treatments that influence the disease course of SMA. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.
objectivesTo evaluate whether drug treatment is able to slow or arrest the disease progression of SMA types II and III and to assess if such therapy can be given safely. Drug treatment for SMA type I is the topic of a separate updated Cochrane review. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (8 March 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1991 to February 2011), EMBASE (January 1991 to February 2011) and ISI Web of Knowledge (January 1991 to March 8 2011). We also searched clinicaltrials.gov to identify as yet unpublished trials (8 March 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomised or quasi-randomised trials that examined the efficacy of drug treatment for SMA types II and III. Participants had to fulfil the clinical criteria and have a deletion or mutation of the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene (5q11.2-13.2) that was confirmed by genetic analysis.The primary outcome measure was to be change in disability score within one year after the onset of treatment. Secondary outcome measures within one year after the onset of treatment were to be change in muscle strength, ability to stand or walk, change in quality of life, time from the start of treatment until death or full time ventilation and adverse events attributable to treatment during the trial period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data from all potentially relevant trials. Pooled relative risks and pooled standardised mean differences were to be calculated to assess treatment efficacy. Risk of bias was systematically analysed. MAIN
resultsSix randomised placebo-controlled trials on treatment for SMA types II and III were found and included in the review: the four in the original review and two trials added in this update. The treatments were creatine (55 participants), phenylbutyrate (107 participants), gabapentin (84 participants), thyrotropin releasing hormone (9 participants), hydroxyurea (57 participants), and combination therapy with valproate and acetyl-L-carnitine (61 participants). None of these studies were completely free of bias. All studies had adequate blinding, sequence generation and reports of primary outcomes.None of the included trials showed any statistically significant effects on the outcome measures in participants with SMA types II and III. One participant died due to suffocation in the hydroxyurea trial and one participant died in the creatine trial. No participants in any of the other four trials died or reached the state of full time ventilation. Serious side effects were infrequent. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no proven efficacious drug treatment for SMA types II and III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.