SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessment of Sexual Function Following Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pelvic floor symptoms 5 to 14 years after total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation as an Adjunct to Standard Bladder Training for Bladder Emptying After Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Trial
- The Oak-wood Extract RobuvitNutrients · 2020Trial
- Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- Sexual functioning after total versus subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy-long term follow up results after 7 years.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Readmission Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in the United States-Outpatient and Inpatient Setting.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Cervical stump leiomyomata after supracervical hysterectomy; a case report with review of literature.BMC women's health · 2024Review
- Article
- Preoperative uterine artery embolisation before hysterectomy in women with giant uterine fibroid and HIV-associated nephropathy.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2024Article
- An age-period-cohort analysis of hysterectomy incidence trends in Germany from 2005 to 2019.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Robotic sacrocolpopexy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024Article
- Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women's Lives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Incidence of self-reported pelvic pain and risk factors for pain 1 year after benign hysterectomy: A register study from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Gynecological Surgery.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Total or Subtotal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Robotic Hysterectomy with Ureter Identification and Uterine Artery Ligation for Benign Gynecological Conditions: An Early-Year Single-Center Experience.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Incidence of and risk factors for vaginal cuff dehiscence following total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a monocentric hospital analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
- Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablationJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysterectomy using an abdominal approach removes either the uterus alone (subtotal hysterectomy) or both the uterus and the cervix (total hysterectomy). The latter is more common but the outcomes have not been systematically compared.
objectivesTo compare short term and long term outcomes of subtotal hysterectomy (STH) with total hysterectomy (TH) for benign gynaecological conditions. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials (July 2011), CENTRAL (July 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2011), EMBASE (1980 to July 2011), CINAHL (January 2005 to July 2011), Biological Abstracts (1980 to December 2005), the National Research Register and relevant citation lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials of women undergoing either total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Nine trials including 1553 participants were included. Independent selection of trials, assessment for risk of bias and data extraction were undertaken by two review authors and the results compared. MAIN
resultsThere was no evidence of a difference in the rates of multiple outcomes that assessed urinary, bowel or sexual function between TH and STH, either in the short term (up to two years post-surgery) or long term (nine years post-surgery). Length of operation (difference of 11 min) and amount of blood lost during surgery (difference of 57 ml) were significantly reduced during subtotal hysterectomy when compared with total hysterectomy. These differences are unlikely to constitute a clinical benefit and there was no evidence of a difference in the odds of blood transfusion. Post-operative fever and urinary retention were less likely (fever: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8; retention: OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.8) and ongoing cyclical vaginal bleeding up to two years after surgery was more likely (OR 16.0, 95% CI 6.1 to 41.6) after STH compared with TH. There was no evidence of a difference in the rates of other complications, recovery from surgery, alleviation of pre-surgery symptoms or readmission rates between the two types of hysterectomy carried out through the abdominal or laparoscopic route, although trials comparing the laparoscopic route were underpowered to detect some differences. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review has not confirmed the perception that subtotal hysterectomy offers improved outcomes for sexual, urinary or bowel function when compared with total abdominal hysterectomy. Women are more likely to experience ongoing cyclical bleeding up to a year after surgery with subtotal hysterectomy compared to total hysterectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.