Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22513910›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy.

T Umapathi, Richard A C Hughes, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Jean-Marc Léger

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immunotherapy in Peripheral Neuropathies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Immunoglobulins: current understanding and future directions.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

T UmapathiDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.umapathi@nni.com.sg
Richard A C Hughes
Eduardo Nobile-Orazio
Jean-Marc Léger
Mylan (South Africa) · ZANational Neuroscience Institute · SGPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2008.

objectivesTo provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 3 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011), and LILACS (January 1982 to September 2011) for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently. MAIN

resultsOnly one randomised controlled trial of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in multifocal motor neuropathy. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with intravenous immunoglobulin, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAccording to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for intravenous immunoglobulin or improving muscle strength. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Indexed as

Drug Therapy, CombinationHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsMotor Neuron DiseaseMycophenolic AcidPolyneuropathiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22513910
OpenAlexW4247211290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.