SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Corticosteroids for treating optic neuritis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroids for treating optic neuritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Corticosteroids or ACTH for acute exacerbations in multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases of the Central Nervous System.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Comparison of the Structure and Function of the Retina and the Optic Nerve in Patients with a History of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Demyelinating Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis Treated and Not Treated with Systemic Steroid Therapy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Detects Axonal Loss After Transient Dexamethasone Treatment in Optic Neuritis Mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Prognostic Factors for Recovery of Vision in Canine Optic Neuritis of Unknown Etiology: 26 Dogs (2003-2018).Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
- Melatonin as a Therapeutic Resource for Inflammatory Visual Diseases.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
- [Immunomodulation and neuroprotection in optic neuritis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016Review
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Optic Neuritis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Review
- Re-evaluating the treatment of acute optic neuritis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2015Review
- [Current recommendations on optic neuritis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2014Article
- Is the incidence of optic neuritis rising? Evidence from an epidemiological study in Barcelona (Spain), 2008-2012.Journal of neurology · 2014Article
- The role of magnetic resonance imaging and visual evoked potential in management of optic neuritis.The Pan African medical journal · 2014Article
- Current options for the treatment of optic neuritis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptic neuritis is an inflammatory disease of the optic nerve. It occurs more commonly in women than in men. Usually presenting with an abrupt loss of vision, recovery of vision is almost never complete. Closely linked in pathogenesis to multiple sclerosis, it may be the initial manifestation for this condition. In certain patients, no underlying cause can be found.
objectivesTo assess the effects of corticosteroids on visual recovery of patients with acute optic neuritis. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1950 to February 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to February 2012), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to February 2012), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 21 February 2012. We also searched reference lists of identified trial reports to find additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized trials that evaluated corticosteroids, in any form, dose or route of administration, in people with acute optic neuritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted the data on methodological quality and outcomes for analysis. MAIN
resultsWe included six randomized trials which included a total of 750 participants. Two trials evaluated low dose oral corticosteroids while one trial evaluated low dose intravenous corticosteroids across two treatment arms and two trials evaluated a higher dose of intravenous corticosteroids. One three-arm trial evaluated low-dose oral corticosteroids and high-dose intravenous corticosteroids against placebo. Trials evaluating oral corticosteroids compared varying doses of corticosteroids with placebo. Hence, we did not conduct a meta-analysis of such trials. In a meta-analysis of trials evaluating corticosteroids with total dose greater than 3000 mg administered intravenously, the relative risk of normal visual acuity with intravenous corticosteroids compared with placebo was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.27) at six months and 1.06 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.22) at one year. The risk ratio of normal contrast sensitivity for the same comparison was 1.10 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.32) at six months follow up. We did not conduct a meta-analysis for this outcome at one year follow up since there was substantial statistical heterogeneity. The risk ratio of normal visual field for this comparison was 1.08 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.22) at six months and 1.02 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.20) at one year. Quality of life was assessed and reported in one trial. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no conclusive evidence of benefit in terms of recovery to normal visual acuity, visual field or contrast sensitivity with either intravenous or oral corticosteroids at the doses evaluated in trials included in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.