Interfollicular epidermal homeostasis: a response to Ghadially, '25 years of epidermal stem cell research'.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Roles for E1-independent replication and E6-mediated p53 degradation during low-risk and high-risk human papillomavirus genome maintenance.PLoS pathogens · 2019
   Article
2. Basic fibroblast growth factor reduces scar by inhibiting the differentiation of epidermal stem cells to myofibroblasts via the Notch1/Jagged1 pathway.Stem cell research & therapy · 2017
   Article
3. Epithelial stem cells and implications for wound repair.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2012
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  25 years of epidermal stem cell research.2012

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as