Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22512472›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2012

The loss of an electrostatic contact unique to AMPA receptor ligand binding domain 2 slows channel activation.

Sandra M Holley, Ahmed H Ahmed, Jayasri Srinivasan, Swetha E Murthy, Gregory A Weiland, Robert E Oswald, Linda M Nowak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra M HolleyDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Ahmed H Ahmed
Jayasri Srinivasan
Swetha E Murthy
Gregory A Weiland
Robert E Oswald
Linda M Nowak
Cornell University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Overall (pp. 40-62)P41GM103485 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CERIONE, RICHARD A. · 2012 to 2018
$15.5M
Structure, function and dynamics of a glutamate receptorR01NS049223 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI OSWALD, ROBERT E · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM103485NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103485NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ligand-gated ion channels undergo conformational changes that transfer the energy of agonist binding to channel opening. Within ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunits, this process is initiated in their bilobate ligand binding domain (LBD) where agonist binding to lobe 1 favors closure of lobe 2 around the agonist and allows formation of interlobe hydrogen bonds. AMPA receptors (GluAs) differ from other iGluRs because glutamate binding causes an aspartate-serine peptide bond in a flexible part of lobe 2 to rotate 180° (flipped conformation), allowing these residues to form cross-cleft H-bonds with tyrosine and glycine in lobe 1. This aspartate also contacts the side chain of a lysine residue in the hydrophobic core of lobe 2 by a salt bridge. We investigated how the peptide flip and electrostatic contact (D655-K660) in GluA3 contribute to receptor function by examining pharmacological and structural properties with an antagonist (CNQX), a partial agonist (kainate), and two full agonists (glutamate and quisqualate) in the wildtype and two mutant receptors. Alanine substitution decreased the agonist potency of GluA3(i)-D655A and GluA3(i)-K660A receptor channels expressed in HEK293 cells and differentially affected agonist binding affinity for isolated LBDs without changing CNQX affinity. Correlations observed in the crystal structures of the mutant LBDs included the loss of the D655-K660 electrostatic contact, agonist-dependent differences in lobe 1 and lobe 2 closure, and unflipped D(A)655-S656 bonds. Glutamate-stimulated activation was slower for both mutants, suggesting that efficient energy transfer of agonist binding within the LBD of AMPA receptors requires an intact tether between the flexible peptide flip domain and the rigid hydrophobic core of lobe 2.

Indexed as

6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneAlanineAmino Acid SubstitutionBinding SitesCell LineCrystallography, X-RayGlutamic AcidHumansHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKainic AcidProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein StabilityProtein Structure, TertiaryQuisqualic Acid6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneAlanineGlutamic AcidKainic AcidQuisqualic AcidReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID22512472
PMCPMC3353734
OpenAlexW1976365457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.