ReviewDrugs2012
Etravirine: a review of its use in the management of treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection.
Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and virological efficacy of etravirine plus two active Nucleos(t)ide analogs in an heterogeneous HIV-infected population.PloS one · 2014Trial
- AI-driven discovery of antiretroviral drug bictegravir and etravirine as inhibitors against monkeypox and related poxviruses.Communications biology · 2025Article
- HIV: how to manage heavily treatment-experienced patients.Drugs in context · 2022Review
- Drug Repositioning in Friedreich Ataxia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Application of 3D-QSAR, Pharmacophore, and Molecular Docking in the Molecular Design of Diarylpyrimidine Derivatives as HIV-1 Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Antiviral drug allergy.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2014Review
- The connection domain mutation N348I in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase enhances resistance to etravirine and rilpivirine but restricts the emergence of the E138K resistance mutation by diminishing viral replication capacity.Journal of virology · 2014Article
- Role of the K101E substitution in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in resistance to rilpivirine and other nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
- Effect of mutations at position E138 in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and their interactions with the M184I mutation on defining patterns of resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors rilpivirine and etravirine.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
- Molecular mechanism of antagonism between the Y181C and E138K mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.Journal of virology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Etravirine (Intelence®) is an orally administered next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). It is approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in treatment-experienced adult patients who have evidence of viral replication and are harbouring HIV-1 strains resistant to other antiretroviral (ARV) agents. In the US, etravirine must be used in combination with other ARV agents; in the EU, it must be used in combination with other ARV agents that include a boosted HIV-1 protease inhibitor. Etravirine shows good activity in vitro against most wild-type strains of HIV-1, as well as against several strains resistant to available NNRTIs. Furthermore, etravirine appears to present a higher barrier than first-generation NNRTIs against the development of drug resistance. Whereas the presence of a single mutation is sufficient to affect the virological response to efavirenz or nevirapine, the resistance profile of etravirine is more complex and a prediction of virological response may be calculated using a weighted genotypic score. Importantly, the most prevalent NNRTI-associated mutation, K103N, alone does not affect the etravirine response. In two identically designed randomized clinical trials, the addition of etravirine to an optimized background therapy (OBT) regimen improved virological responses to a greater extent than placebo plus OBT following 24 weeks' treatment in highly treatment-experienced adult patients with HIV-1 infection who had evidence of viral replication (HIV-1 RNA levels of >5000 copies/mL at baseline). Furthermore, pre-planned pooled analyses of the trials at 48 and 96 weeks showed that etravirine plus OBT provided durable virological suppression. Consistently higher virological response rates were observed for recipients of etravirine plus OBT than placebo plus OBT in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of baseline viral loads, CD4+ cell counts, HIV-1 subtype or the composition of background ARV therapy. Greater improvements from baseline in immunological outcomes were also observed for recipients of etravirine plus OBT compared with those receiving placebo plus OBT over the 96-week treatment period of the trials. When used as part of an OBT regimen in trials of up to 96 weeks duration, etravirine was well tolerated with an overall tolerabilty profile similar to that of placebo. The only treatment-emergent adverse event that occurred with a higher frequency for recipients of etravirine compared with placebo plus OBT was rash. In highly treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection and evidence of viral replication, the addition of etravirine to an OBT regimen provides an effective and well tolerated treatment that leads to improvements in both virological and immunological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.