ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2012
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in an intensive care unit: better accuracy in patients with septic shock.
Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Guideline
- Effect of Ethanol Consumption on the Accuracy of a Glucose Oxidase-Based Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Trial
- Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Trial
- Accuracy of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill adults: improved sensor performance with enhanced calibrations.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2014Trial
- Evaluation of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system in critically ill neonatal foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring systems in intensive care unit patients: a scoping review.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Intensive insulin therapy in sepsis patients: Better data enables better intervention.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Review
- Blood glucose and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill horses: A pilot study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Battlefield Endocrinology.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Article
- Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.Diabetes care · 2018Review
- A prolonged run-in period of standard subcutaneous microdialysis ameliorates quality of interstitial glucose signal in patients after major cardiac surgery.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Outcomes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017Review
- The Clinical Benefits and Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Accuracy, reliability, feasibility and nurse acceptance of a subcutaneous continuous glucose management system in critically ill patients: a prospective clinical trial.Annals of intensive care · 2016Article
- Point and trend accuracy of a continuous intravenous microdialysis-based glucose-monitoring device in critically ill patients: a prospective study.Annals of intensive care · 2016Article
- Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children with critical illness - do we need it?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015Article
- Accuracy of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system in children with septic shock: A pilot study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015Article
- Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis to Determine Patient Condition: A Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Review
- Effects of pH, lactate, hematocrit and potassium level on the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in pediatric intensive care unit.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study assessed the accuracy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (RTCGMS) devices in an intensive care unit (ICU) to determine whether the septic status of the patient has any influence on the accuracy of the RTCGMS. SUBJECTS AND
methodsIn total, 41 patients on insulin therapy were included. Patients were monitored for 72 h using RTCGMS. Arterial blood glucose (ABG) samples were obtained following the protocol established in the ICU. The results were evaluated using paired values (excluding those used for calibration) with the performance assessed using numerical accuracy. Nonparametric tests were used to determine statistically significant differences in accuracy.
resultsIn total, 956 ABG/RTCGMS pairs were analyzed. The overall median relative absolute difference (RAD) was 13.5%, and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria were 68.1%. The median RADs reported for patients with septic shock, with sepsis, and without sepsis were 11.2%, 14.3%, and 16.3%, respectively (P<0.05). Measurements meeting the ISO criteria were 74.5%, 65.6%, and 63.7% for patients with septic shock, with sepsis, and without sepsis, respectively (P<0.05).
conclusionsThe results showed that the septic status of patients influenced the accuracy of the RTCGMS in the ICU. Accuracy was significantly better in patients with septic shock in comparison with the other patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.