Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22511923›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A model of cancer stem cells derived from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells.

Ling Chen, Tomonari Kasai, Yueguang Li, Yuh Sugii, Guoliang Jin, Masashi Okada, Arun Vaidyanath, Akifumi Mizutani, Ayano Satoh, Takayuki Kudoh and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Deep Learning of Cancer Stem Cell Morphology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ling ChenDepartment of Medical and Bioengineering Science, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Tomonari Kasai
Yueguang Li
Yuh Sugii
Guoliang Jin
Masashi Okada
Arun Vaidyanath
Akifumi Mizutani
Ayano Satoh
Takayuki Kudoh
Mary J C Hendrix
David S Salomon
Li Fu
Masaharu Seno
Okayama University · JPNational Cancer Institute · USNorthwestern University · USTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are capable of continuous proliferation and self-renewal and are proposed to play significant roles in oncogenesis, tumor growth, metastasis and cancer recurrence. CSCs are considered derived from normal stem cells affected by the tumor microenvironment although the mechanism of development is not clear yet. In 2007, Yamanaka's group succeeded in generating Nanog mouse induced pluripotent stem (miPS) cells, in which green fluorescent protein (GFP) has been inserted into the 5'-untranslated region of the Nanog gene. Usually, iPS cells, just like embryonic stem cells, are considered to be induced into progenitor cells, which differentiate into various normal phenotypes depending on the normal niche. We hypothesized that CSCs could be derived from Nanog miPS cells in the conditioned culture medium of cancer cell lines, which is a mimic of carcinoma microenvironment. As a result, the Nanog miPS cells treated with the conditioned medium of mouse Lewis lung carcinoma acquired characteristics of CSCs, in that they formed spheroids expressing GFP in suspension culture, and had a high tumorigenicity in Balb/c nude mice exhibiting angiogenesis in vivo. In addition, these iPS-derived CSCs had a capacity of self-renewal and expressed the marker genes, Nanog, Rex1, Eras, Esg1 and Cripto, associated with stem cell properties and an undifferentiated state. Thus we concluded that a model of CSCs was originally developed from miPS cells and proposed the conditioned culture medium of cancer cell lines might perform as niche for producing CSCs. The model of CSCs and the procedure of their establishment will help study the genetic alterations and the secreted factors in the tumor microenvironment which convert miPS cells to CSCs. Furthermore, the identification of potentially bona fide markers of CSCs, which will help the development of novel anti-cancer therapies, might be possible though the CSC model.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCulture Media, ConditionedGenetic MarkersGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanog Homeobox ProteinNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentCulture Media, ConditionedGenetic MarkersGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNanog protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22511923
PMCPMC3325228
OpenAlexW2016658523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.