ArticleJAMA2012
Carboplatin and paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in JAMA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- GSTM1 polymorphism and lung cancer risk among East Asian populations: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- The impact of Bevacizumab (Avastin) on survival in metastatic solid tumors--a meta-analysis and systematic review.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Isolating the Role of Bevacizumab in Elderly Patients With Previously Untreated Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analyses of the ECOG 4599 and PointBreak Trials.American journal of clinical oncology · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Sunitinib malate in previously untreated, nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer patients over the age of 70 years: results of a Phase II trial.Investigational new drugs · 2013Trial
- Trial
- Effects of age on postoperative oral function in older adults with oral squamous cell carcinoma and its cutoff values: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Supporting Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Influence of background cardiovascular risk factors on VEGF inhibitor-related adverse vascular events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Radiotherapy or systemic therapy versus combined therapy in patients with brain metastases: a propensity-score matched study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Relationship between Masticatory Function and Bone Mineral Density in Community-Dwelling Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Relationship between Oral Health Status and Bone Mineral Density in Community-Dwelling Elderly Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- First-line cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen for non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population: plus ça change.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- Open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study on docetaxel plus bevacizumab or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for treatment of elderly (aged ≥75 years) patients with previously untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: TORG1323.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- Effects of Surgery on Survival of Early-Stage Patients With SCLC: Propensity Score Analysis and Nomogram Construction in SEER Database.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Primary Tumor Resection for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer in the Era of Targeted Chemotherapy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Article
- Novel Cancer Therapeutics in Geriatrics: What is Unique to the Aging Patient?Drugs & aging · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextA previous randomized trial demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel improved survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, longer survival was not observed in the subgroup of patients aged 65 years or older.
objectiveTo examine whether adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in older patients with NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRetrospective cohort study of 4168 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with stage IIIB or stage IV non-squamous cell NSCLC diagnosed in 2002-2007 in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) region. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on diagnosis year and type of initial chemotherapy administered within 4 months of diagnosis: (1) diagnosis in 2006-2007 and bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy; (2) diagnosis in 2006-2007 and carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy; or (3) diagnosis in 2002-2005 and carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy. The associations between carboplatin-paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab and overall survival were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analyses including information about patient characteristics recorded in SEER-Medicare.
main outcome measureOverall survival measured from the first date of chemotherapy treatment until death or the censoring date of December 31, 2009.
resultsThe median survival estimates were 9.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.4-18.6) months for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel, 8.9 (IQR, 3.5-19.3) months for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007, and 8.0 (IQR, 3.7-17.2) months for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005. One-year survival probabilities were 39.6% (95% CI, 34.6%-45.4%) for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel vs 40.1% (95% CI, 37.4%-43.0%) for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007 and 35.6% (95% CI, 33.8%-37.5%) for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005. Neither multivariable nor propensity score-adjusted Cox models demonstrated a survival advantage for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel cohorts. In propensity score-stratified models, the hazard ratio for overall survival for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007 was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.89-1.16; P = .85) and compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005 was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83-1.06; P = .28). The propensity score-weighted model and propensity score-matching model similarly failed to demonstrate a statistically significant superiority for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses for key variables did not change these findings.
conclusionAdding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy was not associated with better survival among Medicare patients with advanced NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.