Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22510503›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2012

[Preliminary results of metabolite in serum and urine of lung cancer patients detected by metabolomics].

Yanjie Niu, Yinling Jiang, Changjiang Xu, Xiangying Wang, Youru Liu, Heng Zhao, Baohui Han, Liyan Jiang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research Progress of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Early Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanjie NiuDepartment of Pulmonology, Chest Hospital Affiliated to Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Yinling Jiang
Changjiang Xu
Xiangying Wang
Youru Liu
Heng Zhao
Baohui Han
Liyan Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveLung cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Thus far, good tumor markers for diagnosing this disease have not been found. Therefore, the discovery of novel biomarkers through the application of new methods has become a hotspot in lung cancer research. The aim of this study is to analyze low-molecular-weight metabolites in the serum and urine samples of lung cancer patients and patients with other lung diseases through metabolomics and to explore potential tumor markers further.

methodsBoth serum and urine samples from 19 lung cancer patients and 15 patients with other lung diseases were subjected to metabolomic analysis using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Orthogonal to partial least squares discriminant analysis was performed for modeling. Two sample t-test was used to identify differences in metabolite concentrations.

resultsA total of 57 metabolites were found in the serum, and 38 metabolites were found in the urine. Multivariate statistical analysis yielded a significant distinction in the metabolic profiles between lung cancer patients and patients with other lung diseases. The t-test results indicated a total of 13 metabolites in the serum and 7 metabolites in the urine with statistically significant differences.

conclusionsMetabolomics is useful in discriminating between lung cancer and other lung diseases. As a novel approach, it has potential in the diagnosis of lung cancer at molecular level.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22510503
PMCPMC5999985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.