Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22510480›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2012

Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST.

Grzegorz M Boratyn, Alejandro A Schäffer, Richa Agarwala, Stephen F Altschul, David J Lipman, Thomas L Madden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 440 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
440citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

440 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational Predictions and Evolutionary Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Autophagy · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unusual inheritance of a functionalScience advances · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic islands inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article

380 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grzegorz M BoratynNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. boratyng@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Alejandro A Schäffer
Richa Agarwala
Stephen F Altschul
David J Lipman
Thomas L Madden

Funding

Case Studies In GeneticsZIALM000097 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI SCHAFFER, ALEJANDRO A · 2009 to 2019
$4.6M
Comparative GenomicsZIALM000077 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LIPMAN, DAVID J. · 2009 to 2017
$1.4M
Improvements and Extensions to the BLAST AlgorithmsZIALM000072 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ALTSCHUL, STEPHEN F · 2009 to 2019
$542k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBLAST is a commonly-used software package for comparing a query sequence to a database of known sequences; in this study, we focus on protein sequences. Position-specific-iterated BLAST (PSI-BLAST) iteratively searches a protein sequence database, using the matches in round i to construct a position-specific score matrix (PSSM) for searching the database in round i + 1. Biegert and Söding developed Context-sensitive BLAST (CS-BLAST), which combines information from searching the sequence database with information derived from a library of short protein profiles to achieve better homology detection than PSI-BLAST, which builds its PSSMs from scratch.

resultsWe describe a new method, called domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST (DELTA-BLAST), which searches a database of pre-constructed PSSMs before searching a protein-sequence database, to yield better homology detection. For its PSSMs, DELTA-BLAST employs a subset of NCBI's Conserved Domain Database (CDD). On a test set derived from ASTRAL, with one round of searching, DELTA-BLAST achieves a ROC5000 of 0.270 vs. 0.116 for CS-BLAST. The performance advantage diminishes in iterated searches, but DELTA-BLAST continues to achieve better ROC scores than CS-BLAST.

conclusionsDELTA-BLAST is a useful program for the detection of remote protein homologs. It is available under the "Protein BLAST" link at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein Structure, TertiarySoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyInternetReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSearch EngineSensitivity and SpecificitySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22510480
PMCPMC3438057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.