Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22510331›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2012

Where do young men want to access STI screening? A stratified random probability sample survey of young men in Great Britain.

John M Saunders, Catherine H Mercer, Lorna J Sutcliffe, Graham J Hart, Jackie Cassell, Claudia S Estcourt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John M SaundersQueen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Centre for Immunology and Infectious Disease: Sexual Health & HIV, Barts Sexual Health Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK. j.saunders@qmul.ac.uk
Catherine H Mercer
Lorna J Sutcliffe
Graham J Hart
Jackie Cassell
Claudia S Estcourt
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in UK young people remain high in men and women. However, the National Chlamydia Screening Programme has had limited success in reaching men. The authors explored the acceptability of various medical, recreational and sports venues as settings to access self-collected testing kits for STIs and HIV among men in the general population and those who participate in sport.

methodsA stratified random probability survey of 411 (weighted n=632) men in Great Britain aged 18-35 years using computer-assisted personal and self-interviews.

resultsYoung men engaged well with healthcare with 93.5% registered with, and 75.3% having seen, a general practitioner in the last year. 28.7% and 19.8% had previously screened for STIs and HIV, respectively. Willingness to access self-collected tests for STIs (85.1%) and HIV (86.9%) was high. The most acceptable pick-up points for testing kits were general practice 79.9%, GUM 66.8% and pharmacy 65.4%. There was a low acceptability of sport venues as pick-up points in men as a whole (11.7%), but this was greater among those who participated in sport (53.9%).

conclusionsHealthcare settings were the most acceptable places for accessing STI and HIV self-testing kits. Although young men frequently access general practice, currently little STI screening occurs in this setting. There is considerable potential to screen large numbers of men and find high rates of infection through screening in general practice. While non-clinical settings are acceptable to a minority of men, more research is needed to understand how these venues could be used most effectively.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDiagnostic ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf AdministrationSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22510331
PMCPMC3461759
OpenAlexW2111265528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.