Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22509885›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

e-Learning initiatives to support prescribing.

Simon Maxwell, John Mucklow

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03551106 (Can an E-learning Module Improve Prescriptions of Laboratory Examens by Postgraduate Medical Students?), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03551106 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Can an E-learning Module Improve Prescriptions of Laboratory Examens by Postgraduate Medical Students?

TypeobservationalSponsorHôpital du ValaisRan2018 to 2018Enrolled55ConditionsLearningArmsWeb based learning module
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. What should be updated in the WHO guide to good prescribing?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A pharmacological approach to education.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Is it time for a nontechnical skills approach to prescribing?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon MaxwellClinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, United Kingdom. s.maxwell@ed.ac.uk
John Mucklow
British Pharmacological Society · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preparing medical students to prescribe is a major challenge of undergraduate education. They must develop an understanding of clinical pharmacology and acquire knowledge about drugs and therapeutics, as well as the skills to prescribe for individual patients in the face of multiple variables. The task of delivering the learning required to achieve these attributes relies upon limited numbers of teachers, who have increasingly busy clinical commitments. There is evidence that training is currently insufficient to meet the demands of the workplace. e-Learning provides an opportunity to improve the learning experience. The advantages for teachers are improved distribution of learning content, ease of update, standardization and tracking of learner activities. The advantages for learners are ease of access, greater interactivity and individual choice concerning the pace and mix of learning. Important disadvantages are the considerable resource required to develop e-Learning projects and difficulties in simulating some aspects of the real world prescribing experience. Pre-requisites for developing an e-Learning programme to support prescribing include academic expertise, institutional support, learning technology services and an effective virtual learning environment. e-Learning content might range from complex interactive learning sessions through to static web pages with links. It is now possible to simulate and provide feedback on prescribing decisions and this will improve with advances in virtual reality. Other content might include a student formulary, self-assessment exercises (e.g. calculations), a glossary and an on-line library. There is some evidence for the effectiveness of e-Learning but better research is required into its potential impact on prescribing.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPharmacology, Clinical

Identifiers

PMID22509885
PMCPMC3477330
OpenAlexW1516882544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.