Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22508314›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Nonspecific effect of Mycograb on amphotericin B MIC.

D L Richie, M A Ghannoum, N Isham, K V Thompson, N S Ryder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role ofiScience · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. TargetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The Elusive Anti-Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Candida infections and their prevention.ISRN preventive medicine · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D L RichieNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
M A Ghannoum
N Isham
K V Thompson
N S Ryder
Novartis (United States) · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycograb C28Y is a recombinant human antibody fragment thought to target HSP-90 and potentiate amphotericin B (AMB). Absence of in vivo efficacy led us to reevaluate its in vitro activity. Interactions between AMB and Mycograb were investigated using a checkerboard design. Addition of Mycograb or various unrelated proteins, including human serum, resulted in similar decreases in the MIC of AMB. Potentiation of AMB by Mycograb appears to be a nonspecific protein effect.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansCaspofunginDrug InteractionsEchinocandinsFluconazoleHumansLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsefungumabFluconazoleLipopeptides

Identifiers

PMID22508314
PMCPMC3393390
OpenAlexW2105229309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.