Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22508299›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Characterizations of clinical isolates of clostridium difficile by toxin genotypes and by susceptibility to 12 antimicrobial agents, including fidaxomicin (OPT-80) and rifaximin: a multicenter study in Taiwan.

Chun-Hsing Liao, Wen-Chien Ko, Jang-Jih Lu, Po-Ren Hsueh

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Fidaxomicin for the Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antimicrobial susceptibility ofAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolated from a university teaching hospital in Japan.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chun-Hsing LiaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Wen-Chien Ko
Jang-Jih Lu
Po-Ren Hsueh
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWMemorial Hospital of South Bend · USNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 403 nonduplicate isolates of Clostridium difficile were collected at three major teaching hospitals representing northern, central, and southern Taiwan from January 2005 to December 2010. Of these 403 isolates, 170 (42.2%) were presumed to be nontoxigenic due to the absence of genes for toxins A or B or binary toxin. The remaining 233 (57.8%) isolates carried toxin A and B genes, and 39 (16.7%) of these also had binary toxin genes. The MIC(90) of all isolates for fidaxomicin and rifaximin was 0.5 μg/ml (range, ≤ 0.015 to 0.5 μg/ml) and >128 μg/ml (range, ≤ 0.015 to >128 μg/ml), respectively. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole (MIC(90) of 0.5 μg/ml; range, ≤ 0.03 to 4 μg/ml). Two isolates had reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (MICs, 4 μg/ml). Only 13.6% of isolates were susceptible to clindamycin (MIC of ≤ 2 μg/ml). Nonsusceptibility to moxifloxacin (n = 81, 20.1%) was accompanied by single or multiple mutations in gyrA and gyrB genes in all but eight moxifloxacin-nonsusceptible isolates. Two previously unreported gyrB mutations might independently confer resistance (MIC, 16 μg/ml), Ser416 to Ala and Glu466 to Lys. Moxifloxacin-resistant isolates were cross-resistant to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, but some moxifloxacin-nonsusceptible isolates remained susceptible to gemifloxacin or nemonoxacin at 0.5 μg/ml. This study found the diversity of toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile in the health care setting in Taiwan. All isolates tested were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. Fidaxomicin exhibited potent in vitro activity against all isolates tested, while the more than 10% of Taiwanese isolates with rifaximin MICs of ≥ 128 μg/ml raises concerns.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAza CompoundsBacterial ProteinsClostridioides difficileFluoroquinolonesGemifloxacinGlycosidesLevofloxacinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinNaphthyridinesOfloxacinQuinolinesRifamycinsRifaximinTaiwanAnti-Infective AgentsAza CompoundsBacterial ProteinsFluoroquinolonesGemifloxacinGlycosidesLevofloxacinMoxifloxacinNaphthyridinesOfloxacinOPT 80QuinolinesRifamycinsRifaximinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22508299
PMCPMC3393409
OpenAlexW1967996945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.