Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22508181›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2012

Management of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients.

Dirk R J Kuypers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Outpatient Management of the Kidney Transplant Recipient during the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Pandemic.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. BK Virus Nephropathy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dirk R J KuypersDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. dirk.kuypers@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

PHS HHS 234‑2005‑370011C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) remains an important infectious complication after renal transplantation, affecting 1-10% of recipients and causing graft loss in approximately 50% of cases. With the lack of effective antiviral therapy, intensive monitoring for BK virus (BKV) using nucleic acid testing or urine cytology--in combination with a reduction of immunosuppressive therapy--is advocated to detect and prevent BKV reactivation and PVAN, respectively. In this Review, new insights into BKV biology and the development of PVAN are discussed. Clinical diagnostic approaches for the detection, surveillance and therapeutic monitoring of BKV are described. In addition, various strategies for reduction of immunosuppressive therapy are reviewed and an evaluation provided of the mechanisms of action and clinical effects of currently used adjuvant medication such as cidofovir, leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulins and fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Finally, novel compounds and their in vitro actions against BKV are discussed together with future prospects for specific antiviral drug development.

Indexed as

BK VirusKidney TransplantationAntiviral AgentsHumansPolyomavirus InfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsTumor Virus InfectionsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22508181
OpenAlexW2017461571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.