ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2012
Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid in the spleen of Big Blue® rats.
Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food-Borne Chemical Carcinogens and the Evidence for Human Cancer Risk.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Recent developments in detoxication techniques for aristolochic acid-containing traditional Chinese medicines.RSC advances · 2020Review
- The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Transgenic rat models for mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2017Review
- Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2014Review
- Analysis of TP53 mutation spectra reveals the fingerprint of the potent environmental carcinogen, aristolochic acid.Mutation researchReview
- Aristolochic Acid-Induced Genotoxicity and Toxicogenomic Changes in Rodents.World journal of traditional Chinese medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Aristolochic acid (AA) is a potent human nephrotoxin and carcinogen. We previously reported that AA treatment resulted in DNA damage and mutation in the kidney and liver of rats. In this study, we have determined the DNA adducts and mutations induced by AA in rat spleen. Big Blue® transgenic rats were gavaged with 0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mg AA/kg body weight five-times/week for 3 months. Three DNA adducts, [7-(deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-aristolactam I, 7-(deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-aristolactam II and 7-(deoxyguanosin-N(2)-yl)-aristolactam I], were identified by (32)P-postlabeling. Over the dose range studied, there were strong linear dose-responses for AA-DNA adduct formation in the treated rat spleens, ranging from 4.6 to 217.6 adducts/10(8) nucleotides. Spleen cII mutant frequencies also increased in a dose-dependent manner, ranging from 32.7 to 286.2 × 10(-6) in the treated animals. Mutants isolated from the different treatment groups were sequenced; analysis of the resulting spectra indicated that there was a significant difference between the pattern of mutation in the 10 mg/kg AA-treated and the vehicle control rats. A:T → T:A transversion was the major type of mutation in AA-treated rats, whereas G:C → A:T transition was the main type of mutation in the vehicle controls. These results indicate that AA is genotoxic in the spleen of rats exposed under conditions that result in DNA adduct formation and mutation induction in kidney and liver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.