Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22508037›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Odorant-induced responses recorded from olfactory receptor neurons using the suction pipette technique.

Samsudeen Ponissery Saidu, Michele Dibattista, Hugh R Matthews, Johannes Reisert

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The CaThe Journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  2. CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  3. The long tale of the calcium activated ClChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017
    Review
  4. Cilia- and Flagella-Associated Protein 69 Regulates Olfactory Transduction Kinetics in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Odorant Receptor-Dependent Role of Olfactory Marker Protein in Olfactory Receptor Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samsudeen Ponissery SaiduMonell Chemical Senses Center.
Michele Dibattista
Hugh R Matthews
Johannes Reisert
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Dynamic Aspects of Olfactory Signal TransductionR01DC009613 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REISERT, JOHANNES · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009613NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals sample the odorous environment around them through the chemosensory systems located in the nasal cavity. Chemosensory signals affect complex behaviors such as food choice, predator, conspecific and mate recognition and other socially relevant cues. Olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) are located in the dorsal part of the nasal cavity embedded in the olfactory epithelium. These bipolar neurons send an axon to the olfactory bulb (see Fig. 1, Reisert & Zhao, originally published in the Journal of General Physiology) and extend a single dendrite to the epithelial border from where cilia radiate into the mucus that covers the olfactory epithelium. The cilia contain the signal transduction machinery that ultimately leads to excitatory current influx through the ciliary transduction channels, a cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channel and a Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) channel (Fig. 1). The ensuing depolarization triggers action potential generation at the cell body. In this video we describe the use of the "suction pipette technique" to record odorant-induced responses from ORNs. This method was originally developed to record from rod photoreceptors and a variant of this method can be found at jove.com modified to record from mouse cone photoreceptors. The suction pipette technique was later adapted to also record from ORNs. Briefly, following dissociation of the olfactory epithelium and cell isolation, the entire cell body of an ORN is sucked into the tip of a recording pipette. The dendrite and the cilia remain exposed to the bath solution and thus accessible to solution changes to enable e.g. odorant or pharmacological blocker application. In this configuration, no access to the intracellular environment is gained (no whole-cell voltage clamp) and the intracellular voltage remains free to vary. This allows the simultaneous recording of the slow receptor current that originates at the cilia and fast action potentials fired by the cell body. The difference in kinetics between these two signals allows them to be separated using different filter settings. This technique can be used on any wild type or knockout mouse or to record selectively from ORNs that also express GFP to label specific subsets of ORNs, e.g. expressing a given odorant receptor or ion channel.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsMiceOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSuction

Identifiers

PMID22508037
PMCPMC3466647
OpenAlexW2011891571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.