Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22507716›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2012

What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

J M Lloyd, T Wainwright, R G Middleton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06239649 (The Effect of RF Genicular Nerve Block Applied in the Preoperative Period on Fast-track Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06239649 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of RF Genicular Nerve Block Applied in the Preoperative Period on Fast-track Total Knee Arthroplasty

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain ChronicArmsGenicular nerve Radiofrequency Ablation block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Fast-Track-Arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Research status of the enhanced recovery after surgery in the geriatric hip fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Article
  11. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Review
  12. Fast track in hip arthroplasty.EFORT open reviews · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J M LloydRoyal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. jelloyd1@btinternet.com
T Wainwright
R G Middleton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMinimally invasive hip and knee replacement surgery (MIS) continues to receive coverage in both the popular press and scientific literature. The cited benefits include a smaller scar, less soft tissue trauma, faster recovery, reduced hospital stay, decreased blood loss and reduced post-operative pain. These outcomes are highly desirable and consistent with the aims of fast track hip and knee pathways. This paper evaluates the literature and discusses whether performing MIS over conventional surgical techniques offers advantages in a fast track hip and knee pathway.

methodsAn English language literature search was performed using the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. Case series, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews were included in the review.

resultsThe reported improvements in recovery brought about by MIS must be considered multifactorial. In combination with improved clinical pathways, MIS can be associated with quicker recovery and shorter length of hospital stay.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to indicate that surgical technique alone makes a significant difference to recovery or reduces soft tissue trauma. No consensus on whether to use MIS techniques in fast track hip and knee replacement pathways can therefore be drawn. This is especially important given that the complication rates of MIS in the low to medium volume surgeon appear unacceptably high compared with standard approaches. It is also too early to assess the long-term effects of MIS on implant survival.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArthroscopyHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReview Literature as TopicTreatment Failure

Identifiers

PMID22507716
PMCPMC3705225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.