Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22507701›Full record

ReviewBiology direct2012

Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns.

Igor B Rogozin, Liran Carmel, Miklos Csuros, Eugene V Koonin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology direct, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 427 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Divergent Roles ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Plant Cysteine Oxidase (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome Wide Identification and Characterization ofInternational journal of genomics · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Igor B RogozinNational Center for Biotechnology Information NLM/NIH, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bldg, 38A, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Liran Carmel
Miklos Csuros
Eugene V Koonin
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILNational Center for Biotechnology Information · USUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMPLETELY SEQUENCED GENOMESZ01LM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 1996 to 2008
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHSNLM NIH HHS Z01LM000073-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution of exon-intron structure of eukaryotic genes has been a matter of long-standing, intensive debate. The introns-early concept, later rebranded 'introns first' held that protein-coding genes were interrupted by numerous introns even at the earliest stages of life's evolution and that introns played a major role in the origin of proteins by facilitating recombination of sequences coding for small protein/peptide modules. The introns-late concept held that introns emerged only in eukaryotes and new introns have been accumulating continuously throughout eukaryotic evolution. Analysis of orthologous genes from completely sequenced eukaryotic genomes revealed numerous shared intron positions in orthologous genes from animals and plants and even between animals, plants and protists, suggesting that many ancestral introns have persisted since the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). Reconstructions of intron gain and loss using the growing collection of genomes of diverse eukaryotes and increasingly advanced probabilistic models convincingly show that the LECA and the ancestors of each eukaryotic supergroup had intron-rich genes, with intron densities comparable to those in the most intron-rich modern genomes such as those of vertebrates. The subsequent evolution in most lineages of eukaryotes involved primarily loss of introns, with only a few episodes of substantial intron gain that might have accompanied major evolutionary innovations such as the origin of metazoa. The original invasion of self-splicing Group II introns, presumably originating from the mitochondrial endosymbiont, into the genome of the emerging eukaryote might have been a key factor of eukaryogenesis that in particular triggered the origin of endomembranes and the nucleus. Conversely, splicing errors gave rise to alternative splicing, a major contribution to the biological complexity of multicellular eukaryotes. There is no indication that any prokaryote has ever possessed a spliceosome or introns in protein-coding genes, other than relatively rare mobile self-splicing introns. Thus, the introns-first scenario is not supported by any evidence but exon-intron structure of protein-coding genes appears to have evolved concomitantly with the eukaryotic cell, and introns were a major factor of evolution throughout the history of eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularIntronsAlternative SplicingAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceEukaryotaExonsGenetics, PopulationGenomePhylogenyRNA Splice SitesSelection, GeneticSpliceosomesUntranslated RegionsRNA Splice SitesUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID22507701
PMCPMC3488318
OpenAlexW2128896349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.