ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2012
Development of less invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation model for motor therapy in rodents.
Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional analysis of the characteristics of joint motion and gait pattern in a rodent model following spinal nerve ligation.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
- [¹¹C]acetate and PET/CT assessment of muscle activation in rat studies.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016Article
- The efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with alternating currents in the kilohertz frequency to stimulate gait rhythm in rats following spinal cord injury.Biomedical engineering online · 2015Article
- Effect of intravenous transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on neurotransmitters and synapsins in rats with spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombination therapy is essential for functional repairs of the spinal cord. Rehabilitative therapy can be considered as the key for reorganizing the nervous system after spinal cord regeneration therapy. Functional electrical stimulation has been used as a neuroprosthesis in quadriplegia and can be used for providing rehabilitative therapy to tap the capability for central nervous system reorganization after spinal cord regeneration therapy.
objectiveTo develop a less invasive muscular electrical stimulation model capable of being combined with spinal cord regeneration therapy especially for motor therapy in the acute stage after spinal cord injury.
methodsThe tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius motor points were identified in intact anesthetized adult female Fischer rats, and stimulation needle electrodes were percutaneously inserted into these points. Threshold currents for visual twitches were obtained upon stimulation using pulses of 75 or 8 kHz for 200 ms. Biphasic pulse widths of 20, 40, 80, 100, 300, and 500 µs per phase were used to determine strength-duration curves. Using these parameters and previously obtained locomotor electromyogram data, stimulations were performed on bilateral joint muscle pairs to produce reciprocal flexion/extension movements of the ankle for 15 minutes while three-dimensional joint kinematics were assessed.
resultsRhythmic muscular electrical stimulation with needle electrodes was successfully done, but decreased range of motion (ROM) over time. High-frequency and high-amplitude stimulation was also shown to be effective in alleviating decreases in ROM due to muscle fatigue.
conclusionsThis model will be useful for investigating the ability of rhythmic muscular electrical stimulation therapy to promote motor recovery, in addition to the efficacy of combining treatments with spinal cord regeneration therapy after spinal cord injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.