Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22506839›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2012

Computerized assessment facilitates disclosure of sensitive HIV risk behaviors among African Americans entering substance abuse treatment.

Diana H Caldwell, Gryczynski Jan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Short-term Efficacy of a Brief Intervention to Reduce Drug Misuse and Increase Drug Treatment Utilization Among Adult Emergency Department Patients.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2015
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana H CaldwellFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. dcaldwell@friendsresearch.org
Gryczynski Jan
Friends Research Institute · US

Funding

Engaging Detoxification Clients Into Long-Term TreatmentR01DA011402 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI KATZ HIGHFIELD, ELIZABETH C · 1999 to 2008
$5.3M
Innovative Computer Prototype for HIV Screening and Brief InterventionR41DA029497 · NIDA · RESEARCH CIRCLE ASSOCIATES, LLC · PI CALDWELL, DIANA HOWARD · 2010 to 2010
$112k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011402NIDA NIH HHS R01DA011402NIDA NIH HHS R41 DA029497NIDA NIH HHS R41DA029497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals entering substance abuse treatment are at elevated risk for HIV infection, and clinicians must generally rely on patient self-report to gauge their involvement in risk behaviors. Strategies to improve accurate reporting of personally sensitive or stigmatizing risk behaviors are needed.

objectiveThis study compared computerized and face-to-face interview methods in eliciting self-disclosure of HIV risk behaviors among a high-risk sample of urban African Americans entering substance abuse treatment (N = 146).

methodsParticipants completed a standardized HIV risk behavior screening as a face-to-face interview. Several days later, the same participants completed a computerized self-interview with the same measure, covering the same time frame.

resultsDisclosure rates for many sensitive risk behaviors were considerably higher on the computerized interview. Participants had significantly higher odds of disclosure on the computerized interview compared to the face-to-face interview on 2 of 6 drug risk behaviors examined (ORs between 2.75 and 3.15) and 9 of 13 sex risk behaviors examined (ORs between 1.60 and 6.45). The advantage of the computerized interview was most evident for highly stigmatized behaviors, such as unprotected sex with someone other than a spouse or main partner (OR = 3.93; p < .001), unprotected sex during a commercial sex transaction (OR = 5.63; p < .001), unprotected anal sex (OR = 6.45; p < .001), and using unsterilized syringes (OR = 3.15; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Findings support the utility of computerized risk behavior assessment with African Americans entering substance abuse treatment. Computerized assessment of HIV risk behaviors may be clinically useful in substance abuse treatment and other healthcare venues serving high-risk populations.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterview, PsychologicalLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeedle SharingRisk-TakingSelf DisclosureSexual BehaviorSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID22506839
PMCPMC13570666
OpenAlexW1994849864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.