Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22506537›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate with betahistine in vestibular neuritis: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

Arne-Wulf Scholtz, Raluca Steindl, Nicole Burchardi, Irene Bognar-Steinberg, Wolfgang Baumann

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Drug-Drug Interactions in Vestibular Diseases, Clinical Problems, and Medico-Legal Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cinnarizine: A Contemporary Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Fixed combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate in the prophylactic therapy of vestibular migraine: an observational study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arne-Wulf ScholtzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Raluca Steindl
Nicole Burchardi
Irene Bognar-Steinberg
Wolfgang Baumann
Hennig Arzneimittel (Germany) · DEUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences Kufstein · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVestibular neuritis (VN) is a strongly disabling disease of the peripheral vestibular system. Rapid and effective relief of symptoms is important to allow patients to promptly return to normal physical activity.

objectiveThe aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate in unilateral VN in comparison with betahistine in terms of improvement of vertigo and concomitant symptoms, and performance in neurotological testing.

methodsSixty-two patients were randomized to receive either cinnarizine 20 mg/dimenhydrinate 40 mg as a fixed combination or betahistine 12 mg, each three times daily for 4 weeks. Vertigo and concomitant symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), posturography and a battery of vestibulo-ocular tests, registered by electronystagmography including spontaneous nystagmus, bithermal caloric and rotatory test, among others, were assessed at baseline (t(0)), after 1 week (t(1w)) and after 4 weeks (t(4w)). The primary endpoint was the Mean Vertigo Score (MVS) at t(1w), a composite of 12 individual scores for unprovoked and provoked vertigo, each assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Non-inferiority of the fixed combination versus betahistine would be assumed if the two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for between-group differences in MVS lay entirely below the non-inferiority margin of 1.25 (12.5% of VAS range).

resultsThe fixed combination led to significantly greater improvements in MVS than betahistine both at t(1w) (primary endpoint) and at t(4w) (95% CI for the difference in baseline-adjusted means -0.95, -0.64 at t(1w), -0.77, -0.44 at t(4w); p < 0.001). Vegetative symptoms and ADL also improved significantly more under the fixed combination than under betahistine at t(1w) (p < 0.001, each parameter) and t(4w) (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), both showing a nearly complete remission at t(4w). In the two groups, pathological posturography and electronystagmography parameters normalized during the 4-week treatment. The fixed combination group showed an earlier recovery of spontaneous nystagmus than the betahistine group (t(1w), p < 0.001) and slightly higher improvements in asymmetry of rotation-induced nystagmus at t(1w) and t(4w) (p = 0.041, each time point). No significant differences were found between the treatments in abatement of spontaneous nystagmus at t(4w) and decrease of caloric lateralization or improvement of equilibrium (sensory organization test [SOT], conditions 5/6) at t(1w) and t(4w). No patient reported any adverse event.

conclusionThe results showed that the fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate is an effective and well tolerated option for symptomatic treatment in unilateral VN. The fixed combination led to significant improvements in vertigo and ADL within the first week, and to a nearly complete recovery after 4 weeks. Neurotological testing revealed no signs of a possible detrimental influence of the 4-week treatment with the fixed combination compared with betahistine in terms of recovery of caloric responsiveness and abatement of rotation-induced nystagmus.

Indexed as

AdultBetahistineCinnarizineDimenhydrinateDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsElectronystagmographyFemaleHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesVestibular NeuronitisBetahistineCinnarizineDimenhydrinateDrug CombinationsHistamine H1 Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID22506537
OpenAlexW1608717146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.