ArticleObesity surgery2012
Prediction of whole-body and segmental body composition by bioelectrical impedance in morbidly obese subjects.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- A Spanish Society joint SECO and SEEDO approach to the Post-operative management of the patients undergoing surgery for obesity.Obesity surgery · 2019Guideline
- Body composition assessment in individuals with class II/III obesity: a narrative review.BMC nutrition · 2024Review
- Future lines of research on phase angle: Strengths and limitations.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023Review
- Body Mass Trajectory Affects the Long-Term Occurrence of Metabolic Syndrome in Adult Patients with Severe Obesity.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Development of a Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy Device for Body Composition Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Depression Severity as a Risk Factor of Sarcopenic Obesity in Morbidly Obese Patients.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2019Article
- Validity of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure Developed for Obese Patients: Impact of Body Composition Method.Nutrients · 2018Article
- Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared to a multidisciplinary weight loss program for obesity--effects on body composition and protein status.Obesity surgery · 2013Article
- Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in morbidly obese women.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2013Article
- How to estimate fat mass in overweight and obese subjects.International journal of endocrinology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValidated equations for body composition analysis using bioelectrical impedance (BIA) in morbidly obese (MO) subjects are scarce. Thus, our aim was todevelop new equations from physical and BIA parameters to estimate whole-body and segmental body composition inMO subjects, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) as the reference method.
methodsA cross-sectional study on 159 Caucasian MO subjects (female 78%, age 43.5 ± 11.8 years, BMI 45.6 ± 4.9 kg/m2) divided in two groups was conducted: model building cohort (n = 110) and model validation cohort (n 0 49). Stepwise regression analysis was used to develop specific fat free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) equations.
resultsGender, body weight, and height2/impedance accounted, respectively, for 89.4% (p < 0.001) and 89.3% (p < 0.001) of the variability of DXA-total FFM in the two cohorts. Using the new equation, the mean difference between the DXA-FFM and BIA-FFM estimates was +0.180 kg (95% CI: -0.34 to +0.7 kg, p 0 NS), and the resulting limits of agreement were +6.76 and −6.40 kg. Similarly, good estimates of DXA truncal-, android-, and gynoid-FM from anthropometric and BIA parameters could be obtained from weight, height2/impedance, and waist and hip circumferences (respectively, R2 adjusted: 0.657, 0.776, and 0.770; p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe new equations derived from physical and BIA parameters provide accurate estimates of body composition in MO subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22506280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.