ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2011
A comparison of the korean-ages and stages questionnaires and denver developmental delay screening test.
Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: a systematic review.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of clinical seizures and adverse brain MRI patterns in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and abnormal neurodevelopment.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
- Long-term impact of late pulmonary hypertension requiring medication in extremely preterm infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Insufficient maternal gestational weight gain and infant neurodevelopment at 12 months of age: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Definitions of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and long-term outcomes of extremely preterm infants in Korean Neonatal Network.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Novel two-tiered developmental screening programme for Singaporean toddlers: a quality improvement report.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Association between humidifier disinfectant exposure during infancy and subsequent neuropsychiatric outcomes during childhood: a nation-wide cross-sectional study.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Clinical Usefulness of the Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) for Developmental Delays.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2019Article
- Validity of the Korean Developmental Screening Test for very-low-birth-weight infants.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China.PloS one · 2019Article
- The Validity of the Bayley-III and DDST-II in Preterm Infants With Neurodevelopmental Impairment: A Pilot Study.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2017Article
- The Comparison of M-B CDI-K Short Form and K-ASQ as Screening Test for Language Development.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2016Article
- Developmental process of the arcuate fasciculus from infancy to adolescence: a diffusion tensor imaging study.Neural regeneration research · 2016Article
- Validity of the ages and stages questionnaires in Korean compared to Bayley Scales of infant development-II for screening preterm infants at corrected age of 18-24 months for neurodevelopmental delay.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Article
- The Usefulness of M-B CDI-K Short Form as Screening Test in Children With Language Developmental Delay.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate concurrent validity between the Korean-Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ) and the Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST II), and to evaluate the validity of the K-ASQ as a screening tool for detecting developmental delay of Korean children.
methodA retrospective chart review was done to examine concurrent validity of the screening potentials for developmental delay between the K-ASQ and the DDST II (n=226). We examined validity of the K-ASQ compared with Capute scale (n=141) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) (n=69) as a gold standard of developmental delay. Correlation analysis was used to determine the strength of the associations between tests.
resultsA fair to good strength relationship (k=0.442, p<0.05) was found between the K-ASQ and the DDST II. The test characteristics of the K-ASQ were sensitivity 76.3-90.2%, specificity 62.5-76.5%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) 2.41-3.40, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.16-0.32.
conclusionEvidence of concurrent validity of the K-ASQ with DDST II was found. K-ASQ can be used for screening of developmental delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.