Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22505687›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2012

Roles of Exc protein and DNA homology in the CTnDOT excision reaction.

Carolyn M Keeton, Jeffrey F Gardner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Integration and Excision of CTnDOT.Microbiology spectrum · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn M KeetonDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA. ckeeton2@illinois.edu
Jeffrey F Gardner

Funding

SITE-SPECIFIC RECOMBINATIONR01GM028717 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GARDNER, JEFFREY F · 1985 to 2013
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-28717NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excision from the chromosome is the first step during the transfer of conjugative transposons (CTns) to a recipient. We previously showed that the excision of CTnDOT is more complex than the excision of lambdoid phages and CTns such as Tn916. The excision in vivo of CTnDOT utilizes four CTnDOT-encoded proteins, IntDOT, Xis2c, Xis2d, and Exc, and a host factor. We previously developed an in vitro excision reaction where the recombination sites attL and attR were located on different plasmids. The reaction was inefficient and did not require Exc, suggesting that the reaction conditions did not mimic in vivo conditions. Here, we report the development of an intramolecular excision reaction where the attL and attR sites are located on the same DNA molecule. We found that Exc stimulates the reaction 3- to 5-fold. The efficiency of the excision reaction was also dependent on the distance between the attL and attR sites and on the sequences of the overlap regions between the sites of the strand exchanges. Substrates with identical overlap sequences recombined more efficiently than ones with heterologous overlap sequences. This was surprising, because the integration reaction is not sensitive to heterology in the overlap regions of the attDOT and attB sites.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAttachment Sites, MicrobiologicalBacterial ProteinsBacteroidesConjugation, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsEscherichia coliMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPlasmidsSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID22505687
PMCPMC3434738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.