Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22505663›Full record

ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2012

Physiological regeneration of skin appendages and implications for regenerative medicine.

Cheng-Ming Chuong, Valerie A Randall, Randall B Widelitz, Ping Wu, Ting-Xin Jiang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biofabrication of Human Skin with Its Appendages.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Research advances on skin sweat gland regeneration induced by stem cells and tissue engineering].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Cheng-Ming ChuongDepartment of Pathology, University of Southern California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA. cmchuong@usc.edu
Valerie A Randall
Randall B Widelitz
Ping Wu
Ting-Xin Jiang
University of Southern California · USUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

Size regulation of skin appendagesR01AR047364 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Cheng-Ming Chuong · 2002 to 2026
$10.1M
LIW5R01AR042177 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHUONG, CHENG-MING · 1995 to 2013
$5.7M
Tissue Engineering of New Hair FormationR01AR060306 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHUONG, CHENG-MING · 2010 to 2019
$4.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR042177NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047364NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of regenerative medicine is relatively new, but animals are well known to remake their hair and feathers regularly by normal regenerative physiological processes. Here, we focus on 1) how extrafollicular environments can regulate hair and feather stem cell activities and 2) how different configurations of stem cells can shape organ forms in different body regions to fulfill changing physiological needs.

Indexed as

RegenerationRegenerative MedicineSkin Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsFeathersHairHumansStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID22505663
PMCPMC3620028
OpenAlexW2109619665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.