Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22505625›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

Increasing association mapping power and resolution in mouse genetic studies through the use of meta-analysis for structured populations.

Nicholas A Furlotte, Eun Yong Kang, Atila Van Nas, Charles R Farber, Aldons J Lusis, Eleazar Eskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Genome-wide association study for age-related hearing loss (AHL) in the mouse: a meta-analysis.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hybrid mouse diversity panel: a panel of inbred mouse strains suitable for analysis of complex genetic traits.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas A FurlotteDepartment of Computer Science, Immunology & Molecular Genetic, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Eun Yong Kang
Atila Van Nas
Charles R Farber
Aldons J Lusis
Eleazar Eskin

Funding

Systems genomics of metabolic syndrome traitsP01HL028481 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LUSIS, ALDONS JAKE · 1985 to 2019
$50.2M
Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
Dissection of HDL function using mouse modelsR01HL094322 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LUSIS, ALDONS JAKE · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Discovering the Genetic Basis of HypertensionK25HL080079 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ESKIN, ELEAZAR · 2006 to 2010
$685k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL080079NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL028481NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies in mouse models have played an integral role in the discovery of the mechanisms underlying many human diseases. The primary mode of discovery has been the application of linkage analysis to mouse crosses. This approach results in high power to identify regions that affect traits, but in low resolution, making it difficult to identify the precise genomic location harboring the causal variant. Recently, a panel of mice referred to as the hybrid mouse diversity panel (HMDP) has been developed to overcome this problem. However, power in this panel is limited by the availability of inbred strains. Previous studies have suggested combining results across multiple panels as a means to increase power, but the methods employed may not be well suited to structured populations, such as the HMDP. In this article, we introduce a meta-analysis-based method that may be used to combine HMDP studies with F2 cross studies to gain power, while increasing resolution. Due to the drastically different genetic structure of F2s and the HMDP, the best way to combine two studies for a given SNP depends on the strain distribution pattern in each study. We show that combining results, while accounting for these patterns, leads to increased power and resolution. Using our method to map bone mineral density, we find that two previously implicated loci are replicated with increased significance and that the size of the associated is decreased. We also map HDL cholesterol and show a dramatic increase in the significance of a previously identified result.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, GeneticAnimalsBone DensityCholesterol, HDLGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationHybridization, GeneticMicePhenotypeCholesterol, HDL

Identifiers

PMID22505625
PMCPMC3389987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.