Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22505268›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2012

Implementing an X-ray validation pipeline for the Protein Data Bank.

Swanand Gore, Sameer Velankar, Gerard J Kleywegt

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The CCP4 suite: integrative software for macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Crystal structure of the BREX phage defence protein BrxA.Current research in structural biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Crystal structure of the anti-CRISPR repressor Aca2.Journal of structural biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swanand GoreProtein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, England.
Sameer Velankar
Gerard J Kleywegt

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 088944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing realisation that the quality of the biomacromolecular structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) archive needs to be assessed critically using established and powerful validation methods. The Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) organization has convened several Validation Task Forces (VTFs) to advise on the methods and standards that should be used to validate all of the entries already in the PDB as well as all structures that will be deposited in the future. The recommendations of the X-ray VTF are currently being implemented in a software pipeline. Here, ongoing work on this pipeline is briefly described as well as ways in which validation-related information could be presented to users of structural data.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryProteins

Identifiers

PMID22505268
PMCPMC3322607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.