Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22504648›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2012

New biomarkers with relevance to leprosy diagnosis applicable in areas hyperendemic for leprosy.

Annemieke Geluk, Kidist Bobosha, Jolien J van der Ploeg-van Schip, John S Spencer, Sayera Banu, Marcia V S B Martins, Sang-Nae Cho, Kees L M C Franken, Hee Jin Kim, Yonas Bekele and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Leprosy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interplay among differential exposure toFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Insights intoProteomes · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptomic Analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Annemieke GelukDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands. ageluk@lumc.nl
Kidist Bobosha
Jolien J van der Ploeg-van Schip
John S Spencer
Sayera Banu
Marcia V S B Martins
Sang-Nae Cho
Kees L M C Franken
Hee Jin Kim
Yonas Bekele
Mohammad K M Uddin
Sheikh Abdul Hadi
Abraham Aseffa
Maria C V Pessolani
Geraldo M B Pereira
Hazel M Dockrell
Tom H M Ottenhoff
Leiden University Medical Center · NLArmauer Hansen Research Institute · ETInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRColorado State University · USUniversity of London · GBYonsei University · KR

Funding

Application of Novel Antigens and Integrated Microfluidics for Leprosy DiagnosisR01AI082575 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MODLIN, ROBERT L · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Leprosy Research Support-Post Genome -26625469N01AI025469 · NIAID · Colorado State University · 2004 to 2004
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI025469NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI-082575NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI082575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leprosy is not eradicable with currently available diagnostics or interventions, as evidenced by its stable incidence. Early diagnosis of Mycobacterium leprae infection should therefore be emphasized in leprosy research. It remains challenging to develop tests based on immunological biomarkers that distinguish individuals controlling bacterial replication from those developing disease. To identify biomarkers for field-applicable diagnostics, we determined cytokines/chemokines induced by M. leprae proteins in blood of leprosy patients and endemic controls (EC) from high leprosy-prevalence areas (Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia) and from South Korea, where leprosy is not endemic anymore. M. leprae-sonicate-induced IFN-γ was similar for all groups, excluding M. leprae/IFN-γ as a diagnostic readout. By contrast, ML2478 and ML0840 induced high IFN-γ concentrations in Bangladeshi EC, which were completely absent for South Korean controls. Importantly, ML2478/IFN-γ could indicate distinct degrees of M. leprae exposure, and thereby the risk of infection and transmission, in different parts of Brazilian and Ethiopian cities. Notwithstanding these discriminatory responses, M. leprae proteins did not distinguish patients from EC in one leprosy-endemic area based on IFN-γ. Analyses of additional cytokines/chemokines showed that M. leprae and ML2478 induced significantly higher concentrations of MCP-1, MIP-1β, and IL-1β in patients compared with EC, whereas IFN-inducible protein-10, like IFN-γ, differed between EC from areas with dissimilar leprosy prevalence. This study identifies M. leprae-unique Ags, particularly ML2478, as biomarker tools to measure M. leprae exposure using IFN-γ or IFN-inducible protein-10, and also shows that MCP-1, MIP-1β, and IL-1β can potentially distinguish pathogenic immune responses from those induced during asymptomatic exposure to M. leprae.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, BacterialBangladeshBiomarkersBrazilCytokinesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaLeprosyMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium lepraeRepublic of KoreaAntigens, BacterialBiomarkersCytokinesInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID22504648
PMCPMC3345093
OpenAlexW1904218657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.