Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22504522›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2012

Biology of double-hit B-cell lymphomas.

R Coleman Lindsley, Ann S LaCasce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Coleman LindsleyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann S LaCasce

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172-37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMature B-cell lymphomas bearing concurrent chromosomal rearrangement of MYC/8q24 and BCL2/18q21 are associated with an aggressive clinical course and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. This review summarizes the recent literature regarding the clinical and pathologic features of double-hit lymphomas and outlines current questions about the most accurate and inclusive definition of the disease. RECENT

findingsComprehensive evaluation of large series of aggressive mature B-cell neoplasms reveals recurrent chromosomal aberrations in the majority of cases. A subset of these lymphomas harbors multiple rearrangements, including MYC/8q24 in combination with BCL2/18q21 and/or BCL6/3q27, and displays a particularly aggressive clinical course. Recent data suggest that consideration of additional features, such as copy number alteration, quantitative protein expression, and biologic pathway activation may be important in deriving a more accurate definition of double-hit lymphoma. Despite the poor prognosis associated with this subset of lymphomas, there remains no evidence for a risk-adapted treatment strategy and no clinical, pathologic, or genetic factors that predict response to therapy. SUMMARY: Double-hit lymphoma remains an incompletely characterized disease entity. Large, multicenter studies are needed to define relevant clinical, genetic, and pathologic variables and to characterize appropriate risk-adapted treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGene Rearrangement, B-LymphocyteHumansLymphoma, B-CellPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-cblProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-cblProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22504522
PMCPMC3389520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.