Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22504141›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2012

Standardized definitions of molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia.

N C P Cross, H E White, M C Müller, G Saglio, A Hochhaus

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02852486 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Deep Molecular Response - Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Treatment-free Remission (EDI-PIO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Campinas, BrazilRan2016 to 2024Enrolled31ConditionsLeukemia, Chronic MyeloidArmsPioglitazone 30 Mg Oral Tablet, imatinib discontinuation
NCT03117816 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Proline Interferon Alpha 2b (AOP2014) in Maintaining Deep Molecular Remissions in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Who Discontinue ABL-Kinase Inhibitor Therapy - a Randomized Phase III, Multicenter Trial With Post-study Follow-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2017 to 2022Enrolled214ConditionsChronic Myeloid Leukemia in RemissionArmsAOP2014 / Pegylated-Proline-interferon alpha-2b, Surveillance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 372 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

N C P CrossFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
H E White
M C Müller
G Saglio
A Hochhaus
Heidelberg University · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Turin · ITWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) demonstrated long-term cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib. However, deep molecular responses (MRs), as measured by reductions in BCR-ABL transcript levels below the threshold of major MR, were achieved only by a small proportion of patients. With the advent of the second-generation TKIs nilotinib and dasatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP, the proportion of patients who achieve the deepest levels of MR is likely to increase significantly. With these changes, the potential for patient eligibility in TKI cessations studies is becoming a more widely discussed topic and area for research. These developments highlight the need for robust, standardized and workable definitions of deep MRs. Specifically, it is critical that the measurement of MR is standardized in a manner to withstand both intra- and inter-laboratory variability, as well as new methodological developments. This review summarizes the relevant clinical background and proposes a framework within which standardization of MR can be taken forward.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGenes, ablHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesBiomarkers, TumorProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22504141
OpenAlexW2074301005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.