Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22504093›Full record

Trial reportGastroenterology2012

Abatacept for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

William J Sandborn, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Bruce E Sands, Paul Rutgeerts, Stephan R Targan, Remo Panaccione, Brian Bressler, Karl Geboes, Stefan Schreiber, Richard Aranda and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Role of the CD28 Family Receptors in T-Cell Immunomodulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

William J SandbornDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093-0956,USA. wsandborn@ucsd.edu
Jean-Frederic Colombel
Bruce E Sands
Paul Rutgeerts
Stephan R Targan
Remo Panaccione
Brian Bressler
Karl Geboes
Stefan Schreiber
Richard Aranda
Sheila Gujrathi
Allison Luo
Yun Peng
Luisa Salter-Cid
Stephen B Hanauer
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DECanadian Society of Intestinal Research · CACedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHarvard University · USHôpital Claude Huriez · FRKiel University · DEUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown.

methodsFour placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe CD (CD-IP; CD-MP) and UC (UC-IP1; UC-MP). In CD-IP and UC-IP1, 451 patients with CD and 490 patients with UC were randomized to abatacept 30, 10, or 3 mg/kg (according to body weight) or placebo, and dosed at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. In MP, 90 patients with CD and 131 patients with UC who responded to abatacept at week 12 in the induction trials were randomized to abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks through week 52.

resultsIn CD-IP, 17.2%, 10.2%, and 15.5% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at weeks 8 and 12, vs 14.4% receiving placebo (P = .611, P = .311, and P = .812, respectively). In UC-IP1, 21.4%, 19.0%, and 20.3% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at week 12, vs 29.5% receiving placebo (P = .124, P = .043, and P = .158, respectively). In CD-MP, 23.8% vs 11.1% of abatacept vs placebo patients were in remission at week 52. In UC-MP, 12.5% vs 14.1% of patients receiving abatacept vs placebo were in remission at week 52. Safety generally was comparable between groups.

conclusionsThe studies showed that abatacept is not efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC.

Indexed as

AbataceptAdultColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedAbataceptImmunoconjugatesImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22504093
OpenAlexW2021747913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.