Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22502917›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2012

Basic life support skills of high school students before and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a longitudinal investigation.

Theresa M Meissner, Cordula Kloppe, Christoph Hanefeld

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04286204 (New Information and Communication Technologies), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04286204 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

New Information and Communication Technologies (ICT´s) in Basic Life Support Training for Non-medical Students: Educational Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AntioquiaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsCardiac Arrest, Out-Of-HospitalArmsBasic Life Support training based on ICTs, Classic Basic Life Support training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theresa M MeissnerMedizinische Klinik III, St, Elisabeth-Hospital, Bleichstr, 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany. theresa.meissner@rub.de
Cordula Kloppe
Christoph Hanefeld
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmediate bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly improves survival after a sudden cardiopulmonary collapse. This study assessed the basic life support (BLS) knowledge and performance of high school students before and after CPR training.

methodsThis study included 132 teenagers (mean age 14.6 ± 1.4 years). Students completed a two-hour training course that provided theoretical background on sudden cardiac death (SCD) and a hands-on CPR tutorial. They were asked to perform BLS on a manikin to simulate an SCD scenario before the training. Afterwards, participants encountered the same scenario and completed a questionnaire for self-assessment of their pre- and post-training confidence. Four months later, we assessed the knowledge retention rate of the participants with a BLS performance score.

resultsBefore the training, 29.5% of students performed chest compressions as compared to 99.2% post-training (P < 0.05). At the four-month follow-up, 99% of students still performed correct chest compressions. The overall improvement, assessed by the BLS performance score, was also statistically significant (median of 4 and 10 pre- and post-training, respectively, P < 0.05). After the training, 99.2% stated that they felt confident about performing CPR, as compared to 26.9% (P < 0.05) before the training.

conclusionsBLS training in high school seems highly effective considering the minimal amount of previous knowledge the students possess. We observed significant improvement and a good retention rate four months after training. Increasing the number of trained students may minimize the reluctance to conduct bystander CPR and increase the number of positive outcomes after sudden cardiopulmonary collapse.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeManikinsSchoolsSelf-AssessmentStudentsAdolescentCardiopulmonary ResuscitationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart ArrestHumansMaleProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22502917
PMCPMC3353161
OpenAlexW2153963966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.