Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22500950›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2012

Dendritic cell therapies in transplantation revisited: deletion of recipient DCs deters the effect of therapeutic DCs.

Z Wang, S J Divito, W J Shufesky, T Sumpter, H Wang, O A Tkacheva, W Wang, C Liu, A T Larregina, A E Morelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Regulatory dendritic cells for human organ transplantation.Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.) · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. TIGITNature communications · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Renal Allograft Survival in Nonhuman Primates Infused With Donor Antigen-Pulsed Autologous Regulatory Dendritic Cells.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Z WangT. E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S J Divito
W J Shufesky
T Sumpter
H Wang
O A Tkacheva
W Wang
C Liu
A T Larregina
A E Morelli

Funding

Use of Substance P antagonists to regulate the skin immune functionR01AI077511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LARREGINA, ADRIANA T · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
Graft Tolerance with Apoptotic Cells and Dendritic CellsR01HL077545 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORELLI, ADRIAN E. · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
The role of tolerogenic dendritic cells in islet-cell allograft transplantationF30DK082131 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DIVITO, SHERRIE JILL · 2008 to 2010
$132k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077545NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077511NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK082131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical goal in transplantation is the achievement of donor-specific tolerance, minimizing the use of immunosuppressants. Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen (Ag) presenting cells (APCs) with capability to promote immunity or tolerance. The immune-regulatory properties of DCs have been exploited for generation of tolerogenic/immunosuppressive (IS) DCs that, when transfer systemically, prolong allograft survival in murine models. Surprisingly, the in vivo mechanisms of therapies based on (donor- or recipient-derived) ISDCs in transplantation remain unknown, given that previous studies investigated their effects in vitro, or ex vivo after transplantation. Since once injected, ISDCs are short-lived and transfer Ag to recipient APCs, we assessed the role of recipient DCs by depleting them at the time of ISDC-therapy in a mouse model of cardiac transplantation. The results indicate that, contrary to the accepted paradigm, systemically administered ISDCs reduce the alloresponse and prolong allograft survival, not by themselves, but through conventional DCs (cDCs) of the recipient. These findings raise doubts on the advantages of the currently used ISDC-therapies, since the immune-regulatory properties of the injected ISDC do not seem to be functionally relevant in vivo, and the quiescent/pro-tolerogenic status of cDCs may be compromised in patients with end-stage diseases that require transplantation.

Indexed as

Dendritic CellsTransplantationAdoptive TransferAnimalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryImmunosuppressive AgentsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22500950
PMCPMC3365643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.