Trial reportTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2012
Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Trial report in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00991510 (Comparative Bioavailability of Myfenax®), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Bioavailability of Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) in Stable Patients After Renal Transplantation
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015Pooled it
- Generics in transplantation medicine: Randomized comparison of innovator and substitution products containing mycophenolate mofetil .International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Trial
- Generic immunosuppressants.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2018Review
- The adoption of generic immunosuppressant medications in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation among recipients in Colorado or nationally with Medicare part D.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) - Myfenax(®) (Teva) and CellCept(®) (Roche) - in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We included KTRs at least 12 months post-transplantation with stable renal graft function for at least 3 months. The maintenance treatment consisted of MMF in combination with tacrolimus with or without steroids. At the end of the two treatment periods, 6-h or 12-h PK studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were performed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13.5 years; 19 females, 24 males) were randomized. Estimates of test to reference ratios (90% CIs) were 0.959 (0.899; 1.023) h*μg/ml for AUC((0-tau)) and 0.873 (0.787; 0.968) μg/ml for C(max). Estimates for AUC((0-6h)) were 0.923 (0.865; 0.984) h*μg/ml and 0.985 (0.877; 1.106) μg/ml for C(min). Thus, AUC((0-tau)), AUC((0-6h)), and C(min) of MPA were within the predefined margins. C(max) was somewhat outside of these margins in this set of patients. The numbers and types of adverse events were not different between the two treatments. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA as well as adverse events are comparable for Myfenax(®) and CellCept(®) in tacrolimus-treated stable KTRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.