Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22500576›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2012

The epidemiology of postpartum malaria: a systematic review.

Machteld E Boel, Marcus J Rijken, Bernard J Brabin, François Nosten, Rose McGready

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Heat Shock Proteins as Targets for Novel Antimalarial Drug Discovery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Malaria in the pregnant traveler.Journal of travel medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Antibody Responses toThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical aspects of uncomplicated and severe malaria.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Machteld E BoelShoklo Malaria Research Unit, PO Box 46, 63110 Mae Sot Tak, Thailand. machteld@shoklo-unit.com
Marcus J Rijken
Bernard J Brabin
François Nosten
Rose McGready

Funding

Wellcome Trust 089275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria than their non-pregnant counterparts. Less is known about the risk of malaria in the postpartum period. The epidemiology of postpartum malaria was systematically reviewed. Eleven articles fitted the inclusion criteria. Of the 10 studies that compared malaria data from the postpartum period with pregnancy data, nine studies suggested that the risk for malaria infection decreased after delivery. All three studies that compared postpartum data with non-pregnant non-postpartum women concluded that the risk did not return to pre-pregnancy levels immediately after delivery. The results of this review have to be carefully interpreted, as the majority of studies were not designed to study postpartum malaria, and there was large variability in study designs and reported outcomes. Current evidence suggests an effort should be made to detect and radically cure malaria during pregnancy so that women do not enter the postpartum period with residual parasites.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodFemaleHumansMalariaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID22500576
PMCPMC3379929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.