ArticleCore evidence2005
Exubera(®) (inhaled insulin): an evidence-based review of its effectiveness in the management of diabetes.
Article in Core evidence, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insulin glargine in the management of diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based assessment of its clinical efficacy and economic value.Core evidence · 2007Article
- Evolution of a pulmonary insulin delivery system (Exubera) for patients with diabetes.MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInadequate glycemic control contributes to the development and progression of complications, which are associated with a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. However, optimal glycemic control is difficult to sustain with oral antidiabetic agents and adherence to intensive insulin regimens is compromised by patient compliance to multiple daily injections. Therefore, alternative delivery systems are required to improve the acceptability of insulin therapy.
aimsThis review assesses the evidence for the therapeutic value of inhaled insulin (Exubera(®)) in the management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Evidence indicates that glycemic control, as measured by plasma HbA(1c) levels, with Exubera is as effective as subcutaneous insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. There is also good evidence that Exubera provides improved patient satisfaction and ease of use compared with subcutaneous insulin. However, the cost effectiveness of Exubera and its place in therapy compared with other inhaled insulin delivery systems currently in development remain to be determined. OUTCOMES SUMMARY: Exubera is an alternative treatment option for the management of diabetes which provides effective glycemic control with improved patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22500147PMC3321660W1743246674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.