Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22500114›Full record

ArticleBiologics : targets & therapy2012

Stem cell-mediated osteogenesis: therapeutic potential for bone tissue engineering.

Josh Neman, Amanda Hambrecht, Cherie Cadry, Rahul Jandial

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. miR-193-3p ameliorates bone resorption in ovariectomized mice by blocking NFATc1 signaling.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Molecular View of Pathological Microcalcification in Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Differentiation of immortalized human precartilaginous stem cells into nucleus pulposus-like cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josh NemanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte.
Amanda Hambrecht
Cherie Cadry
Rahul Jandial

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration often requires bony spinal fusion for long-term relief. Current arthrodesis procedures use bone grafts from autogenous bone, allogenic backed bone, or synthetic materials. Autogenous bone grafts can result in donor site morbidity and pain at the donor site, while allogenic backed bone and synthetic materials have variable effectiveness. Given these limitations, researchers have focused on new treatments that will allow for safe and successful bone repair and regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells have received attention for their ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, cells that synthesize new bone. With the recent advances in scaffold and biomaterial technology as well as stem cell manipulation and transplantation, stem cells and their scaffolds are uniquely positioned to bring about significant improvements in the treatment and outcomes of spinal fusion and other injuries.

Indexed as

autograftbone morphogenetic proteinmesenchymal stem cellosteoblastosteogenesisscaffoldsWnt

Identifiers

PMID22500114
PMCPMC3324839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.