Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22500084›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2012

Effects of saponins against clinical E. coli strains and eukaryotic cell line.

Michał Arabski, Aneta Węgierek-Ciuk, Grzegorz Czerwonka, Anna Lankoff, Wiesław Kaca

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel use ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Ferroptosis-Like Death Induction inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Open veterinary journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Effect of dietaryJournal of animal science and technology · 2024
    Article
  14. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Effects of Mangosteen (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Feasibility of the crude extracts ofJournal of dental sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Triterpenoid Saponins from Washnut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. The Phagosome-Lysosome Fusion Is the Target of a PurifiedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michał ArabskiDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland. arabski@ujk.edu.pl
Aneta Węgierek-Ciuk
Grzegorz Czerwonka
Anna Lankoff
Wiesław Kaca
Jan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saponins are detergent-like substances showing antibacterial as well as anticancer potential. In this study, the effects of saponins from Quillaja saponaria were analyzed against prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Multidrug-resistant clinical E. coli strains were isolated from human urine. As eukaryotic cells, the CHO-K1 cell lines were applied. Antibacterial effect of ampicillin, streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin in the presence of saponins was measured by cultivation methods. Properties of saponins against CHO-K1 cells were measured by the MTT test, hemolysis assay and flow cytometry. Saponin from Quillaja saponaria has a cytotoxic effect at concentrations higher than 25 μg/mL and in the range of 12-50 μg/mL significantly increases the level of early apoptotic cells. Saponin at dose of 12 μg/mL enhances the six E. coli strains growth. We postulate that saponins increase the influx of nutrients from the medium into E. coli cells. Saponins do not have synergetic effects on antibacterial action of tested antibiotics. In contrary, in the presence of saponins and antibiotics, more CFU/mL E. coli cells were observed. This effect was similar to saponins action alone towards E. coli cells. In conclusion, saponins was cytotoxic against CHO-K1 cells, whereas against E. coli cells this effect was not observed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsApoptosisCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCHO CellsColony Count, MicrobialCricetinaeCricetulusErythrocytesEscherichia coliHemolysisHumansMalePlant BarkPlant ExtractsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsSaponins

Identifiers

PMID22500084
PMCPMC3303633
OpenAlexW2015573080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.